who didnt take cox as loophole captian?

MarkPlow · May 01, 2011, 03:30:36 PM

Had cox as VC. Decided not to take it as Swan is averaging 130. Anyone else in the same boat?

LaHug · May 01, 2011, 03:32:52 PM

I don't have Swan and I kept Cox. Would have anyways though. Only Stanton or Watson would've taken the C from him and I have neither.

MarkPlow · May 01, 2011, 03:34:57 PM

if i didnt have swan I would have kept Cox's score. But I am ranked pretty high overall and Considering Swan is averaging 130 (Cox scored 121) thought it would be a dumb move to take a score lower than Swan's average.

LaHug · May 01, 2011, 03:39:13 PM

Fair enough. I'd feel safer taking Cox's score, but Swan's average against the Doggies last year was phenomenal.

MarkPlow · May 01, 2011, 03:41:21 PM

will find out in a few hours if it was a smart move or not

TMurphBROWNLOW · May 01, 2011, 03:47:11 PM

swan 170 ;)

modify: 70 ;)

Ago97 · May 01, 2011, 03:48:46 PM

i was going to do the loophole but my phone registered the partial lockout as a full lockout >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
so i missed thompson too

C-Dogg · May 01, 2011, 04:41:36 PM

i took cox vc, EASYYYYYYYY

bundyboy · May 01, 2011, 05:08:35 PM

same...and given the scores so far this round, thank goodness I did !

Andrew · May 01, 2011, 06:29:05 PM

121 as captain is always acceptable, you're being greedy otherwise. Perfect use of the loop-hole taking a guaranteed 121 instead of rolling the dice with someone else (ie. Swan who scored 104 last week). I'd take 121 from my captain every week.

Flame · May 01, 2011, 08:51:47 PM

Coxy you star!!!

Andrew · May 01, 2011, 08:55:02 PM

Loophole you ripper!!!