Progressive scores for round 6

[North Melbournes Finest]

I'm on 249 after 3 which isn't good. But I have had 2 rookies play (Tapscott / Darling / Grimes) all not really renown point gatherers of my team so can't say I'm shattered.

What you whores and hoes on?

[troy87]

379 from 4.

Still undecided on whether to use the Cox VC loop hole

[sj9177]

270

Darling, Grimes, Hurn (what a wast hurn was)

[Adz23]

415 - Cox(C), darling, tapscott

[Marstar]

511 : Cox (c), Darling, Grimes, Tap.

[cortez]

550 cox - c, tap, darling, Grimes, gysberts. Very unhappy with gysberts!

[Fletch74]

Either 409/4 or 540 from 5 if I take Cox as VC. That is the question???

Also have Darlign as EMG, will Yarran play? If not, I'll leave him on, if so, I have to put Buddy on for McKernan...

Does anyone know?

[North Melbournes Finest]

OMG I'm set for another terrible score. Duigan crap, Gibbs flowering crap!! What the flower is wrong with Gibbs.... Goodes crap! Dude play like a dual brownlow medalist you flower. Mumford good! Like always :)

[twinkle]

The problem with Gibbs SC score is they have been making him tag. To make matters worse he is tagging Goodes effectively... :'(

I also have Duigan on the field and looks like a low score for him too.

At least Judd and Curnow are doing well

[North Melbournes Finest]

Mumford is an amazing unique for me :)

Gibbs / Goodes / Duigan

flower you all, hate you 3 under achieveing duds :(

[Samm79]

Mumford is up there with Cox and Sandi for sure, his work at ground level is awesome!

850 from 8 with Cox as skipper

[meow meow]

690 from 6 inc captain Cox. However, it's actually from 7 since Higgins won't play.

[schezza]

just wondering what ppl's scores are after 2 games????

[ajjewell]

521 with 8 played not a good start, at least I have got one of my donuts out of the way :)

[Fletch74]

935/9 with Cox as VC...

Goodes, Gibbs, and Duigan all disasters.