subs killing the cows

Started by thatguy, April 25, 2011, 10:13:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

thatguy

hows everyone travelling with the bloody sub rule potentially killing our cash cows?

in a normal year you would want at least somewhere near a 100k rise from the rookies before offloading them... but does this strategy change now with the sub rule? already we have seen popular picks bewick, krakouer and richardson start as the sub... potentially bringing their ceiling down meaning we have to offload earlier!


Chopps

yea richardson isnt goin to make enough it delays them being cows

Windigo

Quoteyea richardson isnt goin to make enough it delays them being cows

Yep, but the problem rising here is that there are no starting price rookies in the FWDS....

Is it time to take $ 100,000 made from Duigan and get Thompson from the Crows before he goes up?

Wilkopolis

Quote from: Windigo on April 25, 2011, 10:27:09 AM
Quoteyea richardson isnt goin to make enough it delays them being cows

Yep, but the problem rising here is that there are no starting price rookies in the FWDS....

Is it time to take $ 100,000 made from Duigan and get Thompson from the Crows before he goes up?

Darling, Tapscott and Matera have all done the right thing by their owners.  If you have these players then you've got a couple of options to get to Chappy, Didak, etc without needing to prematurely sell off Krak or Richo

LF

yep have all 3 plus richo of them but one of those i`m keeping as a permanent emergency probs matera since gc are the first team to have 2 byes.

Plastic Boy

Depending on how Lower goes today is whether I trade him or not, time to bring in guns and cut the rookies out permanently.

yorgis

you got it plastic boy. these byes are killin' me

Cicjose

bring on 2012 so byes don't become an issue

Ziplock

unless the afl decide to have a 24 game season for the tv, and ditch NAB cup  :P