richardson as the sub

LF · April 24, 2011, 08:41:35 PM

really think the roos stuffed this up big time.there was now way richardson should have been their sub.look at the others subs teams are using.they are coming on giving their teams extra run,busting open games etc.guys like richardson and when sydney used their ruckman(please remind me who it was) just don`t seem to be any good to be used as subs.

Nails · April 24, 2011, 08:43:48 PM

Good choice imo. Meant they had their best 21 on for the majority of the game.

I don't see why you want a game breaker to be on for 1 quarter of a game when surely they're better on for 3 quarters, I think your sub should be your 22nd best player..

LF · April 24, 2011, 08:45:22 PM

good point
but if they had a game breaking sub the roos may have actually got over the line.

Windigo · April 24, 2011, 08:45:46 PM

His goose is cooked. Damn, I'm having a feast with Krak's donut on the way & Richo's goose. :P

TMurphBROWNLOW · April 24, 2011, 08:46:42 PM

when was Richardson subbed on?

LF · April 24, 2011, 08:48:05 PM

last 4mins i think it was in the 3rd.

Footy God · April 24, 2011, 08:48:35 PM

Quote from: luvfooty on April 24, 2011, 08:45:22 PM
good point
but if they had a game breaking sub the roos may have actually got over the line.

I guess they should have subbed Petrie on in the 4th when they were 100 down

LF · April 24, 2011, 08:50:41 PM

petrie wouldn`t be a good choice of a sub either thats a stupid comment.

Holz · April 24, 2011, 08:54:42 PM

majak daw as the suber sub would be good, im sure he could bring something special for the win.

TMurphBROWNLOW · April 24, 2011, 08:57:52 PM

Quote from: Holzman on April 24, 2011, 08:54:42 PM
majak daw as the suber sub would be good, im sure he could bring something special for the win.

yep I can see that happening :)

LF · April 24, 2011, 09:00:05 PM

had to check what you meant holz didn`t realise there was a player with that name.

Problems · April 24, 2011, 09:12:29 PM

I agree with you luvfooty on Nth Melbs weird substitution today and it costing them the game. Was there any reason they took Gartlett off? I thought he was providing a lot more to the team than others like Lindsey Thomas, why didn't Brad Scott give him the fluro vest and get Richardson involved much earlier?

Holz · April 24, 2011, 09:21:44 PM

Quote from: TMurphBROWNLOW on April 24, 2011, 08:57:52 PM
Quote from: Holzman on April 24, 2011, 08:54:42 PM
majak daw as the suber sub would be good, im sure he could bring something special for the win.

yep I can see that happening :)

he probably would have marked it on the line from martins kick and ran through the whole team and kicked it from 80m out into the goals.

LF · April 24, 2011, 10:09:41 PM

holz who is majak daw?have you seen him play at all? Not being smart arse or anything just curious.

Davoo · April 25, 2011, 12:38:14 AM

majak daw looks like a gun from SA!