2nd ruck spot

[enzedder]

Petrie 4 goals at half time...104 SC pts according to MMM...or 96 pts if looking at superfooty update...either way I'm a happy pup atm.

[twinkle]

ha ha yeah I change my mind - Petrie big time!  :P

[Maca24]

I disagree, i would have said smith last week, and I will probably say smith again this week.  Apparently the ball was not going to petrie at all in the forward 50.

If you see petrie kicking goals against the tigers, then go petrie.

Otherwise I would go smith.

Ill hold you to that CS. l'm confident on this one. :P

Smith 69. Told you so ;)

Shoulda listened to you Maca :(

next time RB ;) Hate to be the bearer of bad news but petrie on 120pts at 3qtr time.

[charliesheen]

i did say, and i did clarify what i disagreed with.   whcih is not neccessary the petrie selection, but choosing someone based on their price.

i.e. Knights vs Tapscott  ,  Otten vs lower, etc...

If you see petrie kicking goals against the tigers, then go petrie.

[supercoachheroes]

You were implying that smith would be the betr choice by saying don't always go with more expensive

[charliesheen]

I would have still stuck with petrie because I didn't think he would kick that many goals.

However, if anyone thought he would kick goals, I would advise them to choose petrie over smith.

I was disagreeing with the logic/reasoning behind choosing petrie over smith.

If Maca24 had said you should choose petrie over smith, because he was likely to kick more goals then that is a different context.

Hope that reclarified things.

Just semantics, shold have been more clear the first time.

[Master Q]

I had Petrie on the bench with Smith on the field  >:(

[Maca24]

I would have still stuck with petrie because I didn't think he would kick that many goals.

However, if anyone thought he would kick goals, I would advise them to choose petrie over smith.

I was disagreeing with the logic/reasoning behind choosing petrie over smith.

If Maca24 had said you should choose petrie over smith, because he was likely to kick more goals then that is a different context.

Hope that reclarified things.

Just semantics, shold have been more clear the first time.

Sorry CS, Wasnt trying to make it me vs you. was just happy with my judgement  :P

[charliesheen]

thats okay, rooboy should have his name changed.

sell out!

[roo boys!]

thats okay, rooboy should have his name changed.

sell out!

Jeeeeesus, terrible decision on my behalf :'(

I have decided this year to try and not let my bias towards North players affect my SC team, as in my debut season I had 12 Kangaroos in my 22...

[charliesheen]

lol u should see meow meow team at end of year.

will have lake, boyd, higgins, hill, rob murphy, etc..

[roo boys!]

lol u should see meow meow team at end of year.

will have lake, boyd, higgins, hill, rob murphy, etc..

Haha yeah, I was considering a couple this week and after a while decided to ignore meow meow's comments :P Apparently all of them will average 120+ by the end of the season... :P

[charliesheen]

mitch wallis for brownlow

[roo boys!]

Lake for Coleman and Norm Smith