Adcock's 119 or Pendlebury... or Selwood?

Started by LaHug, April 21, 2011, 11:33:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Who for Captain?

Adcock's 119
10 (52.6%)
Pendlebury
8 (42.1%)
Selwood
1 (5.3%)

Total Members Voted: 1

LaHug

Used the loophole and had Adcock as VC. Do I take his 119 or go Pendlebury?
Thinking it's a coin flip at the moment...

matt1985

Definitely a coin flip! Who knows Pendles could come out and get a 120+ I had the vc of voldt, if I had it on Goddard i'd be happy to take that score. Let the coin decide :P

elephants


Head Coach

Nah I'd go Swan, and if i didnt have him i'd probs stop playing because i'd realise how stupid I am to not have him... But luckily enough for me I do, so there is a point to me continuing to play. haha, okay but seriously, its a matter of weighing up pendles possible scores, he's not likely to score anything less then 90 you'd think, and could score up to 150... so his range is 30 points either side of jeds score, so I agree could be flip of the coin but i'd say go pendles.

Scotch

Pendlebury is a big game performer and is a serial winner of medals up for grabs.  Go with him IMO

hardnut

got same question but to coin an old saying " a bird in the hand...." take 119 and run with it. I see Pendles score rank as 90-130 so it' s unlikely to really hurt you either way and at least it's points in the bag

LaHug

Oh, it's 119 now... I swear it said 117 when I wrote this.

LaHug

Points to consider with Pendlebury:
Last 3 average: 119
Last 3 against Essendon: 134, 97, 64
Probably safer to take Adcock's score, but so difficult to choose.

hardnut

Bombers are a much better defensive team this year, Hocking will tag Pendles....

LaHug

Quote from: hardnut on April 22, 2011, 12:21:49 AM
Bombers are a much better defensive team this year, Hocking will tag Pendles....
Why wouldn't Hocking tag Swan like last Anzac Day?

LaHug

Also, new option that I had disregarded for some reason... Joel Selwood against the Hawks?
Last 3 against them: 104, 90, 185!!!
Sure, it was in 2009, but a 185 is hard to look past!
Averaging about 101 this year in the two games he was conscious.

Master Q

Take Adcock's score. However I'm giving the C back to Swan as I think he'll outscore Goddard.

matt1985

185 is very impressive! I wonder if Swan can crack the 200 against GC?? But Selwood has bounced back pretty well and normally plays well against the hawks! It's a tough call, flip a coin maybe lol.

bundyboy

no question if you have Swan - just stick with him

I'm still tossing between pendles and boyd....compared to keeping goddard's 113 ??  so same question v's adcock - is the risk worth it ??

not sure it is....

LaHug

I don't have Swan. I had planned on getting him after a few tough-ish games (Carlton, Essendon, Bulldogs, Geelong). If he's not cheaper after that, I'll look like a bigger twat than I do at the moment.

My guesses are Pendlebury 115, Selwood 130. Not worth the risk for 11 points. If he gets 185, I'll be kicking myself all weekend!