Montags you gun!!

[Flame]

What a gun!!

Is 126 a good enough score for skipper this week?

Using The Loop Hole..Had him as VC??

Swanny as skipper..

[Footy God]

Should have been 138. Robbed of two tackles and should have had a kick at the end. Ill take his score.

[Holz]

its annoying when you have the money to trade him in but you hold off hoping he falls 15k+, anyway i will be hqappy next week when i have him in my team.

[Flame]

Yeah he has been down a bit..but he came through this week..

I think I'll keep him as skipper!!

[Footy God]

You couldnt risk anyone else but Swan for 126.


Quote from Calvin's Captains: (DT TALK/Assistnat coach)
Of course… but let’s make sure everyone is aware of this first. Last ANZAC Day Swan only had 83, his lowest score for 2010! In that game he has tagged by Hocking. Swan still had 25d but struggled all day for his 83. Later on in the year, in Rd.20, the Pies and Bombers met again. He had 116 and was once again tagged by several guys but he powered along for his 31d. In his last 3 games against any team in the AFL, his worst record is against the Bombers. But can you really go against a guy who is averaging 136 in his last 3 this year? Nope, I won’t be!


Id back him to still get 120. But fairly risky, Montagna easy

[Wraygun]

i personally had Adcock for 119, im not taking it

IMO anything over 125 you should take

[Bartel#3]

Should have been 138. Robbed of two tackles and should have had a kick at the end. Ill take his score.

footy god, im just curious how can 2 tackles and a kick take tags to 138?

Tackle = 4
Kick = 3

126 + 4 + 4 + 3 = 137. Rookie Mistake

[Prospector_1]

137 or 138 I'd have taken. 126 I'm at sixes and sevens.

[Flame]

137 or 138 I'd have taken. 126 I'm at sixes and sevens.

+1

[Spooners]

v Essendon, I reckon Swans max on Monday will be 140 ie. +14 on montagna
his minimum - as people saw last year - is 40 below montagna's score.

play it safe in my opinion

[Spite]

Should have been 138. Robbed of two tackles and should have had a kick at the end. Ill take his score.

footy god, im just curious how can 2 tackles and a kick take tags to 138?

Tackle = 4
Kick = 3

126 + 4 + 4 + 3 = 137. Rookie Mistake

Reposting a comment purely to start an argument and flame with another person on the forum (who is clearly much more liked than yourself on the forum) is a rookie mistake. Now please leave, thanks.

[Fletch74]

Should have been 138. Robbed of two tackles and should have had a kick at the end. Ill take his score.

footy god, im just curious how can 2 tackles and a kick take tags to 138?

Tackle = 4
Kick = 3

126 + 4 + 4 + 3 = 137. Rookie Mistake

Reposting a comment purely to start an argument and flame with another person on the forum (who is clearly much more liked than yourself on the forum) is a rookie mistake. Now please leave, thanks.

+1 we don't want arrogant people like yourself around mate.

[Chopps]

so the point scoring asside 137 or 138 who really cares about maths (bartel 3 obviously)

126 good enough then?

[Spooners]

I think its a little low but Swan could score 15 above it or 40 below it - last yr v Essendon.

Play it safe and hope Swan fails for once

[Ziplock]

that's a really good bet to take this season considering his lowest score is 116 atm :P