Tribunal News: 2) Pav still eligible for Brownlow

Started by valkorum, April 19, 2011, 08:45:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

valkorum

Pav has had his charge of reckless downgraded to negligent.  This takes his points loading to 45 which means he is still eligible for the brownlow

A win for Freo - you beauty

TheHanger

is pav really that big a favourite for the brownlow anyway, i mean he is a good player and i know how defensive of him you are Valko but i didn't think he was any chane for the brownlow, not a big one anyway

swedishhmafia

Quote from: TheHanger on April 19, 2011, 09:10:19 PM
is pav really that big a favourite for the brownlow anyway, i mean he is a good player and i know how defensive of him you are Valko but i didn't think he was any chane for the brownlow, not a big one anyway
agree, i think Mundy is a better chance

korza


Windigo

Judd will get it.
Have heard reports:

That some people saw him over at "Razor Rays" house about 2 hours ago. I wonder..... ::)

Mish

Pav is Freos best player hands down. although the reffs dont like him.

i wonder how collingwood players will go, swan, pendles and the rest of the collingwood team will keep stealing points of eachother.

penskifile

If Essendon keep winning games, Watson has to be a chance.

Cicjose

Gazza!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

no seriously if geelong keep winning (this is my smokie for the year)

Stevie J

valkorum

From following the tribunal live Pav was worried about the fact that the charge was deemed reckless.  I think he wanted to keep his good standing in the game more than anything.  Pav is on the rules committee and understands the difference between reckless and negligent and all his defense was based around being negligent not reckless.

In 240 games Pav has never been suspended and has only been charged once (which was thrown out) so I think this was more about his good standing than anything else.

Ziplock

Quote from: Mish on April 19, 2011, 10:34:32 PM
Pav is Freos best player hands down. although the reffs dont like him.

i wonder how collingwood players will go, swan, pendles and the rest of the collingwood team will keep stealing points of eachother.
not well :P Why do you think Judd won over the like of swan + pendles?

because last year Judd was really the only half decent player in Carlton's entire team lol.

Slap

if it was barry Hall or buddy franklin, it woulda been weeks.


just saying.

Ziplock

lol, that's because barry hall and buddy franklin always pull that crap.

browny_wce

Bazz n Buddy have pretty bad records

Pav won't win a brownlow
Too much comp from Sandi, Mundy, Hill, Barlow later, etc.

valkorum

Quote from: browny_wce on April 20, 2011, 03:25:52 PM
Bazz n Buddy have pretty bad records

Pav won't win a brownlow
Too much comp from Sandi, Mundy, Hill, Barlow later, etc.

I am sick of hearing about too much competition from blah blah blah.  Its a load of shower

What happened during the glory days of Eagles during the mid 2000's - Judd, Cousins, Kerr.  Everyone said there was too much competition from all of its stars but yet Judd and Cousins both won Brownlows (Kerr also came damn close)

What about Brisbane before that - Aker and Black both won Brownlows

In recent times you have Geelong - Bartel and Ablett both winning Brownlows

I am quite confident that someone from Collingwood will win the Brownlow this year.

Slap

Quote from: valkorum on April 20, 2011, 04:06:52 PM
Quote from: browny_wce on April 20, 2011, 03:25:52 PM
Bazz n Buddy have pretty bad records

Pav won't win a brownlow
Too much comp from Sandi, Mundy, Hill, Barlow later, etc.

I am sick of hearing about too much competition from blah blah blah.  Its a load of shower

What happened during the glory days of Eagles during the mid 2000's - Judd, Cousins, Kerr.  Everyone said there was too much competition from all of its stars but yet Judd and Cousins both won Brownlows (Kerr also came damn close)

What about Brisbane before that - Aker and Black both won Brownlows

In recent times you have Geelong - Bartel and Ablett both winning Brownlows

I am quite confident that someone from Collingwood will win the Brownlow this year.

Me to Valks.  I also suspect that it could be a reason why pendlebury has a hideous hair cut atm.  Just like aka and woewodin had blonde hair. goodes had dark skin, cousins had his rippling body, ablett had his bald head.  Just little standout features that can HELP a player win the brownlow.

That is not to say that the players aren't good(es) lol, but having standout features like daisy thomas' blonde hair wont harm their chances.  Also include players you recognise instantly when they get the ball, aka. Pav, J Brown, N Riewoldt, Bartel etc.