bruce to who?

[Davoo]

save ur trades

[david.5]

thats a good trade imo. plus we've been given two extra trades from last year and 3 more sub players. You can afford to fix a few mistakes in your side in order to max out your team of keepers as soon as possible

[BratPack]

I'm keeping Bruce to the bitter end if I must....

Same, as much as he's been a disappointment so far, almost ALL the backs have been, looking through what's going on in the backs I see only two guys worth taking at this point. One's Brady Rawlings who's too up and down and the Other is Nathan Bock, who is on an inexperienced Suns team. Once Enright's bye passes I might consider him but for now I just don't like the alternatives.

[Holz]

bruce and connors look like possible good upgrade targets, along with didak and jack voldt in the forward line with selwood and gaz in the mddle

[boo-yaa]

i've changed my mind, bruce has to go.

[Windigo]

i've changed my mind, bruce has to go.

At your peril.

After so many good consistent DT year's he is defined by just 3 games.

I assuming no one had him in his demon year's and his just coming into the fore no....
You can't blame him for being the sub now can you?

I'm with BratPack on this one. Most back men are struggling at the moment. Except Gram.....

[Bluke]

Bruce will be fine.. He wont start as sub again this week. Coaches are sharing it around.

[boo-yaa]

mmmmm...... stratton has gone down with a PCL as well so he'd be back in.
bruce himself may not be the reason he has to go for me, its i've got a mid price replacement for him and i need the cash.
i've lost a balanced structure to my team atm, my back premiums in gibbs, god, grimes, bruce and broughts arn't produceing and i'm hoping a mid pricer will help my mids structure.
swan, boyd, sammy then rookies i'm not a fan of anymore, another gun would be nice with those 3.