Can someone please talk me out of this trade!!

[Stocutz]

I'd stay with Dixon. Looks a player, score ok for a fwd on a side that lost by 20  goals.

[JoeMontana]

Dixon has a 46, against Carlton, not a real breathtaking score mind U, Gold Coast will struggle to get the ball forward, U will find they will have the lowest Dreamteam scores for the whole season. I think they scored around 1250 on the weekend.

Tapscott, has scored 2 80's, against the Swans, who are hard to score against, and against the Hawks, who have a premium midfield and he scored well against them. He has a break even of -80, so he has a few weeks of price rises, projected $120,000 the next 3 weeks, probably double that the next 5-6 weeks.

This week Tapscott has Brisbane at the G, potentially a 100 plus score if he plays the whole game and isn't subbed or starts as a sub. Dixon is travelling first time with Gold Coast to Melbourne, to play the Dogs who woke up last week against Brisbane.

Up to U if you miss this gravy train, good luck to U.

[Fenno]

Dixon has a 46, against Carlton, not a real breathtaking score mind U, Gold Coast will struggle to get the ball forward, U will find they will have the lowest Dreamteam scores for the whole season. I think they scored around 1250 on the weekend.

Tapscott, has scored 2 80's, against the Swans, who are hard to score against, and against the Hawks, who have a premium midfield and he scored well against them. He has a break even of -80, so he has a few weeks of price rises, projected $120,000 the next 3 weeks, probably double that the next 5-6 weeks.

This week Tapscott has Brisbane at the G, potentially a 100 plus score if he plays the whole game and isn't subbed or starts as a sub. Dixon is travelling first time with Gold Coast to Melbourne, to play the Dogs who woke up last week against Brisbane.

Up to U if you miss this gravy train, good luck to U.

Clearly you didn't read the point of this post it was to talk him out of trading so you just wrote a massive post for no real reason at all. Sometimes its a better decision as much as it may hurt a little to miss a rookie that is scoring well if it means later on in the season you still have trades and not scoring 0s. There is always going to be another rookie scoring well just around the corner and the fact is you can't get them all unless you want to run out of trades. I say if you have missed out on a decent scoring rookie but your rookies are playing suck it up and accept you have just missed out.

I didn't pick up Tapscott rd1 so I just have to accept im going to miss out because really there is no really point getting him in because he is scoring a few extra points than the rookies I have and he will end up rising in Value 50k more. Firstly he isn't going to be a keeper and secondly a trade is worth more than 50k.

[Bluke]

Dixon is not a rookie worth trading out. His JS is excellent, he will play Full Foward all season. Lets face it, he is the only bloke big enough to play against the key defenders.

The GC midfield will get better, their senior players let them down last week. They're alot better than that and against the lesser teams, Brisbane, Melbourne, Richmond, Port, West Coast, North they will score good points and their midfield has a chance to dominate. Dont write them off after one game against a top six contender. Especially when it was plain as day that they didnt have their mind on the game.