Double trade?

[LaHug]

Almost certainly doing Foley --> Libba this week.
But should I go Gamble --> Dawes or Gamble --> Tapscott?
Obviously, going to Tapscott will save me $183k which will be useful later, but Dawes could be a keeper if he plays the way he's playing. Would hate to miss out.
What do people think?

[LaHug]

Or, alternatively, do I keep Gamble...? He is set to rise in price (but not very much and nowhere near as much as Dawes or Tapscott).

[elephants]

Foley to libber is a certainty, I would save the trade on gamble.

[LaHug]

I agree with the Libba part, but I'm so afraid of missing the boat on Dawes or Tapscott (whichever way I may go).
I don't see Gamble getting high enough to be an effective cash cow, and he's playing way too poorly to consider him a keeper...

[Bluke]

Dawes, he will be a keeper.

[LaHug]

Thanks Bluke. That was my thoughts exactly but was just praying for some confirmation!

[ronl]

Not so sure on Dawes...it's early days and a long way to go.

[Mish]

Not so sure on Dawes...it's early days and a long way to go.

+1 plus collingwood just played 2 bottom 4 sides.

[yorgis]

do the libba trade and i'm guessing gamble may get better with kosi coming back soon. [more crumbing options]

[j959]

i'm not hot on Gamble (i reckon he's a KPP stuck in a crumbers - albeit a tall one - body) but unless you're really confident on Dawes (who i rate) you don't have to pull the trigger on the trade.

if you reckon you can live with Dawes as a keeper (regardless of of success or fail) then you do the trade, otherwise ...

[LaHug]

Yeh, I just don't think Gamble is a good move after all... Maybe I could get Tapscott? I really want to know if anyone knows anything special about Dawes.

[Holz]

Not so sure on Dawes...it's early days and a long way to go.

+1 plus collingwood just played 2 bottom 4 sides.

not sure about this comment mish, for me i still wouldn't get dawes if i were you i would look at maybee getting in someone like jack voldt once his 0 comes out of his average, is probably a safer bet than dawes.

[bundyboy]

agree with Holz...

big fat zero in Jack will make him beatifully priced in 3 weeks....:)

[LaHug]

Sadly I already have Jack :( but looking like Dawes is the move I'll make!

[elephants]

Dawes relies on goal for points, will be inconsistent.