sub rule killing supercoach

[juddyboy]

had heath shaw, nick lower and andrew krakouer! this sub rule is ruining supercoach!

[Holz]

the sub rule is taking the last amount of skill out of the game, its purely on luck now, if you had somehow avoided the sub rule at this stage than you would probably be 200 points ahead of me for that reason.

[roo boys!]

I know how you feel, it really sucks.

[Plastic Boy]

This will be my last year doing this... there is too much luck and frustration around this game now and I am hating it.

Palmer, Lower and Krakouer.  All guys that should be playing full games are getting 1 quarter to play, except Lower.

A subbed player should be able to be replaced by and emergency/bench player.

[Slashers]

A subbed player should be able to be replaced by and emergency/bench player.

Yea, something along those lines would have been a good idea.

[swedishhmafia]

A subbed player should be able to be replaced by and emergency/bench player.

Yea, something along those lines would have been a good idea.

completely agree. selwood foley lower. just a joke

[Alex7089]

A subbed player should be able to be replaced by and emergency/bench player.

Yea, something along those lines would have been a good idea.

completely agree. selwood foley lower. just a joke

I personally think we should be given a sub. So that we can bring any one of our benchies on for a player who was subbed at any time during the round.
Would ease the pain -_-

[nathan11]

yeah would be great if the sub was named when the teams were, but the afl isn't going to change that so herald sun needs to make an adjustment to make it fair for us all.  Where do we write and complain to them about it?

[Alex7089]

Hack the site and change it :P
I thought the bye would help to make the better coaches outplay the nuffies but this is making things even again (in some cases) -__-

[C-Dogg]

everyone is in the same boat, but by saying this some people get worse luck than others