Curnow Yes or No?

Started by Blueboys, April 03, 2011, 01:27:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

To Curnow for who?

D Swallow
4 (15.4%)
D Harris
4 (15.4%)
R Bewick
3 (11.5%)
A Gaff
14 (53.8%)
D Prestia
1 (3.8%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Blueboys


Footy God


Roy.G.Biv

Bewick or Gaff, gives you that extra flexiblity for multi bye rounds 4 & 5?

Blueboys

Quote from: Footy God on April 03, 2011, 01:32:28 AM
Harris has to go buddy

Done soon as trades open up!  ;)

hmmm good thinking Roy.G.Biv - Gaff seems to be the sub atm and round 4 & 5 will be a killer!  ;D

LaHug

Gaff if anyone. Looking like a consistent sub choice for at least the meantime.

Footy God

If I do it I have to choose from Savage, Swallow, Bewick.

Its not worth a trade imo, Curnows job security isnt too safe either. Very risky. Tonights game was a joke, last week he did well agaisnt Tigers. Im going to take the hit if he does well, only worth a trade if he averaged a good 40 more than any of the above players. I highly doubt that.

Bluke

I'm contemplaying Hibberd -> Curnow

I would loose my Defence MPP though because Heppell would have to stay in my defence.

chatters24

My personal thoughts are to stay away from Curnow. Job security isn't good at all. Even after racking up all those points last week he was still one of the last names to appear on the interchange list. Smells a lot like Gysberts!

garos888

also thinking atley to curnow.

who is injured from carlton thats likely to take his place once fit?


Flame

I'd keep Harris and toss Gaff!!

browny_wce

remember DT ability means FA in real game performance