Krak & Anthony subs for Pies v Roos game

chatters24 · April 02, 2011, 02:07:47 PM

Exactly as the subject states.

This will hurt plenty!!

nas · April 02, 2011, 02:11:52 PM

More so with Anthony than Krak as most people have him so will be ok

chrisuzz · April 02, 2011, 02:13:24 PM

Source ??

Heavy blow for my team as i have both :(

Bluke · April 02, 2011, 02:14:04 PM

flowers sakes... sub rule bites again

I rekon you've basicaly got to assume that AT LEAST one player per week will be subbed in your team. If your lucky none or one. 3 for me last week. One so far this week...

wce06 · April 02, 2011, 02:17:54 PM

Krak, ok yeah it sucks but everyone has him. Anthony on the other hand, fark me I have him and my opponent has bloody A.Swallow >:( sucks big time! why would you put Anthony as your sub?????? grr

chatters24 · April 02, 2011, 02:18:34 PM

Quote from: chrisuzz on April 02, 2011, 02:13:24 PM
Source ??

Heavy blow for my team as i have both :(

Triple M.

Krak will be fine, most people would have him, however if you have Anthony that will hurt, particularly when he's in your team as a premium mid!

chatters24 · April 02, 2011, 02:19:45 PM

Quote from: wce06 on April 02, 2011, 02:17:54 PM
Krak, ok yeah it sucks but everyone has him. Anthony on the other hand, fark me I have him and my opponent has bloody A.Swallow >:( sucks big time! why would you put Anthony as your sub?????? grr

Not sure why they would choose Anthoby as a sub. You would surely think he would be on shortly after half time though!

Bluke · April 02, 2011, 02:21:50 PM

Looks like the coaches are trialing 'impact' players this week.

Jones last night, today Krak and Anthony. All players that can run and come on and hopefully have a big impact on the game. Personnaly I would have played both but I guess we will see alot of this experimentation early on in the season. Still think they should have left the bench at 4 and added on a sub.

chrisuzz · April 02, 2011, 02:21:57 PM

im hoping someone runs through Swallow...

garos888 · April 02, 2011, 02:22:08 PM

how is anthony sub over atley who was a spud last week???

i got both - not happy jan >:(

also i thought the sub had to come from the bench players, obviously not

wce06 · April 02, 2011, 02:24:51 PM

Yep agree. You would think Atley is more likely to be a sub than Anthony! Strange from both teams, 2 quality players as subs.

elite · April 02, 2011, 02:25:09 PM

source is also here : http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/110632/default.aspx

chatters24 · April 02, 2011, 02:32:29 PM

Quote from: elite on April 02, 2011, 02:25:09 PM
source is also here : http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/110632/default.aspx

Thanks elite!

Quote from: wce06 on April 02, 2011, 02:24:51 PM
Yep agree. You would think Atley is more likely to be a sub than Anthony! Strange from both teams, 2 quality players as subs.

Atley I thought would have nearly been a definete! Although I think there could have been a player who would affect their owners even more if they were a sub and that would be Petrie. After getting him even after he was out for the first week thru suspension, that really would have pissed off a lot of people!

Davoo · April 02, 2011, 02:49:41 PM

why sub krak!? i hope like someone gets concussed from collingwood. hate this rule

ando_10 · April 02, 2011, 03:01:39 PM

dont worry nearly EVERYONE has him.