Captain for non-Swan teams

[hardnut]

glad to see this getting some hits, appears to be a two horse race. I was on Gibbs but given Selwood is now out I'm going for a lower risk approach and picking Goddard I think. Don't expect a 140+ that Gibbs could get but can't see him going under 100 either.

[hardnut]

Give up, you should not have a non swan team.

Getting very bored of this theme. Started without Swan last year and finished 3015th, you can do it you just have to think about it a bit more.....Hard to fault teams with him as you know what your going to get but c'mon there are heaps of quality DT options out there

[thanme]

My main thinking for Gibbs is the GC factor. I reckon he'll have a field day.

[matt1985]

I've gone gibbs, he should get 30+ touches easily against the GC kids.

[elephants]

goddard.

[LF]

Goddard.he pulls some awesome scores against richmond.his sc score  last against them was 188.

thats SC buddy... stick with DT here!

gibbs would have to be a chance to back up against the GC boys
[/quote

i only quoted his sc score because i couldn`t exactly remember his dt score it was between 130 and 150  i think.

[Holz]

Give up, you should not have a non swan team.

Getting very bored of this theme. Started without Swan last year and finished 3015th, you can do it you just have to think about it a bit more.....Hard to fault teams with him as you know what your going to get but c'mon there are heaps of quality DT options out there

you definately dont need swan, there are goo picks everyweek, gibbs was the one last week and joey/goddard are the ones this week. Not picking swa neams alot more work each week and a bit of luck but could potentially payoff.

[bundyboy]

loved Gibbs last week, and really thought about him again for r2 - but figured God would have to kill it against richmond after having a quiet game last week.......guess I was wrong  :'( :'(

can you really afford not to have swan....got to ask that question now....