Anyone burnt by VC rule

Started by Cicjose, March 27, 2011, 11:36:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cicjose

I'm going to lose because my opponent has gibbs as VC and no captain

anyone else going to lose this way this week?

bowsaints

Nope. helped me win this week. Same loophole was open to anyone who played dt. So its all fair.

Cicjose

thanks a lot for cheering me up

HevvieEvvie

Left Gibbs as my VC in Dream Team which worked out good and put the C on Swanny in SC which worked out GREAT!

Sorry for not cheering you up  :(

Spite

Person in my league who got 2220 has a capt showing and not a v.capt. If he loses weekly because of it, I'm sure he'll be more upset!

Cicjose

I'm doomed for the rest of the year now i think

Ziplock

I was worried this was going to happen, so I fielded matera, se him as captain and set richardson as emergency

nas

Quote from: Cicjose on March 27, 2011, 11:36:08 PM
I'm going to lose because my opponent has gibbs as VC and no captain

anyone else going to lose this way this week?

I put C on Prestia in our league which helped in my victory in the Exlam League @ had Tapscott as Emerg. Gibbs had the VC

Cicjose

So its official i was the only one??? on all of FF to be burnt by the VC rule i don't believe that

Bak2Form

Quote from: Cicjose on March 27, 2011, 11:36:08 PM
I'm going to lose because my opponent has gibbs as VC and no captain

anyone else going to lose this way this week?

unluky lol, gibbs helped me win too aswell BIG COX

Cicjose

i know i have big COX!

but srsly i cannot be the only person on FF to lose this way this week

glam77

did i see your scores were as follows...

"2014 with my opponent getting 2140 with the loophole"

surely the loophole could only have gained you opponent 20 extra points by going with Gibbs say over Swan.

Bak2Form

Quote from: glam77 on March 28, 2011, 12:48:16 PM
surely the loophole could only have gained you opponent 20 extra points by going with Gibbs say over Swan.

My opponent had boyd

glam77

Quote from: Bak2Form on March 28, 2011, 12:52:10 PM
Quote from: glam77 on March 28, 2011, 12:48:16 PM
surely the loophole could only have gained you opponent 20 extra points by going with Gibbs say over Swan.

My opponent had boyd

ok, then a 124 point turnaround if my maths is correct.

still wouldn't have helped cicjose's 126 point defecit. a close loss could be attibuted to the VC loophole, but not really a 126 point loss.

Cicjose

i didnt say that was the only contributing factor my opponent also had rioli who was only a handful of forwards forward to pass 100 points

Dawes, J Riewoldt, Stevens, O' Keefe, L Jetta and Zaharakis were the others