which team should i go with? radical team 1, or conventional team 2?

[Gava]

Team 1:

goddard
gibbs
delidio
grimes
r shaw
otten
stanely
(hibberd, duigan, lower)

swan
montagna
bartel
A swallow
harris
heppel
(bewick, irons, prestia)

sandilands
petrie
(vickery, smith)

Franklin
s johnson
riewoldt
mcglynn
higgins
knights
krakour
(richardson, matera, tapscott)


Team 2:
Goddard
gibbs
delidio
grimes
broughton
otten
stanely
(hibberd, lower, duigan)

Swan
boyd
bartel
A.swallow
d.swallow
harris
(prestia, bewick, heppel)

sandilands
cox
(smith, bailey)

franklin
s johnson
riewoldt
higgins
knights
krakouer
richardson
(matera, tapscott, darling)

Which team is the better? obviously team 2 is far more conventional, considering rucks and r shaw etc. i had previously thought that to succeed this year with the byes and substitutes that different methods would be needed. i also think that rookies will let us down on the field, considering the sub rule, thus mid pricers will be more valuable, ala rhys shaw. what are your thoughts?