Tapscott or Prestia?

[steven_ora]

Which rookie will average more?? who will play more games?? who is the better option??

[enzedder]

I've jumped off Prestia and am thinking about having Tapscott. If Tapscott is named R1 it's a done deal...you won't have that luxury with Prestia and their R2 start...many other coaches are probably thinking the same.

[steven_ora]

true probably better off getting tapscott if named round 1 just because you know he is in their team for that week and most likely atleast the first half of the season but with prestia you are taking the risk of hoping he is named in round 2...

[cortez]

why wouldnt he be named for round 2? he's one of there best kds.

[steven_ora]

well 1 week is a long time in footy and i no i will get sucked in and just take tapscott coz he will be playing rather then wait a week and who knows prestia could get injured between rounds 1 and 2...

[nathan11]

why wouldnt he be named for round 2? he's one of there best kds.

he didn't play in the last trial, so that's a big question mark about him being named.

[scotty_222]

what about polec? or one of the rookies from brissy

[Bennyy]

Prestia. WIll play lots more games