everitt

[ando_10]

had a good pre season.
new club
new role.
a good unique as a 5th back???
thoughts.

[Usman]

he's a risk . He collected 27 touches last game though but it was against GWS so it doesnt really say much. I cant see hime avg alot but could make a bit of money but he is so expensive with such a high risk its not really worth it.

[ando_10]

he's a risk . He collected 27 touches last game though but it was against GWS so it doesnt really say much. I cant see hime avg alot but could make a bit of money but he is so expensive with such a high risk its not really worth it.

it was against the saints mate

[Usman]

oh i was sure it was against GWS my bad then

[BGK]

It was the saints. I think your better off with him than Adcock. I'm going with him. Especially now malceski has gone down

[j959]

i'm thinking about taking a punt on him for DT but not for SC ...

[burner11]

NO!

[enzedder]

NO!

^

[ando_10]

any reason why no fellas?

[meow meow]

Turnover merchant.

[enzedder]

Too risky. People who spend $300k on players with 60 averages invariably regret it. There are some exceptions but he won't be one of them IMO. Malceski's injury will help him in terms of game time but still risky any way you look at it. I'd get someone more expensive...Grimes, Grundy, Shaw, Duffield, Newman... or another $100k rookie.

[reesbr]

Would you have backline with the last 3 on the ground Otten Heppell *100k player*???

[sid3bysid3]

i would take him over a rookie for 2 reasons.

his game could suit supercoach as he kicks long, takes grabs and does have skills - he turns it over cause of nerves IMO... was always playing to stay in the side at the dogs.

second of all, he has JS now - will play 22 games injury permitting

[enzedder]

Would you have backline with the last 3 on the ground Otten Heppell *100k player*???

No...as a 5th defender I'd get someone else more expensive like the ones I mentioned...but a 100k rookie would be better than Everitt IMO...a rookie can score 60 points and earn you $ while doing it.