anyone else coping a ruck donut rnd 1??

[tkringle]

OK, so i'm considering copping a ruck donut in round 1..

Rucks are currently Cox, Fraser (Smith Z, Tippett J) - 3 GC ruckmen..

Cox & Fraser to start most weeks with Z smith as 3rd ruck.. I also have Tippett to activate MPP for Petrie who is in the forward line..

I like this line-up, only problem is it mean a donut rnd 1...

anyone else doing the same?

[Aralt]

It is a sin to have a donut for round 1.

........Where is Sandi? Like Swan and Goddard he is  must.
I say flick Petrie (down grade target), Fraser and J. Tippet > Sandi, Derickx (watch what the woods do with Keefe) and Michie

[meow meow]

Haha, hell no. I've got Sandilands, Cox, Fraser and Petrie as my rucks. If Sandilands gets a rest, and Fraser gets injured, then i'll still be able to have 2 rucks who will produce decent scores. Having a strong ruck bench is vital if you ask me.

[BGK]

Haha, hell no. I've got Sandilands, Cox, Fraser and Petrie as my rucks. If Sandilands gets a rest, and Fraser gets injured, then i'll still be able to have 2 rucks who will produce decent scores. Having a strong ruck bench is vital if you ask me.

I know you think his idea is funny but 95% of people on here would make fun of you. What a waste of money in the rucks.

[enzedder]

Haha, hell no. I've got Sandilands, Cox, Fraser and Petrie as my rucks. If Sandilands gets a rest, and Fraser gets injured, then i'll still be able to have 2 rucks who will produce decent scores. Having a strong ruck bench is vital if you ask me.

I know you think his idea is funny but 95% of people on here would make fun of you. What a waste of money in the rucks.

Red Herring maybe...it's meow meow giving more gems of wisdom...take with a pinch of salt or a bucket load for that matter

[scotty_222]

id get rid of tippet and have either smith or fraser..

[tferrier18]

you're all idiots

[Swallow12]

Unless you have Petrie in the forwards get rid of Tippet, and get rid of Fraser anyways find a way to get Sandi

[tkringle]

Yes i have Petrie in my forward line (its the only reason I have Tippett)..

I've decided to go with Cox over Sandi (risk i know). I will be trying to get Sandi in my side by mid year..

If i get rid of Fraser I have $401,300 to spend on a replacement starter.. any suggestions?

[tkringle]

The other ruck option i've been toying with is a set and forget ruck line of Cox & Sandi.. however this would mean losing Swan in favour of pendelbury..

[nathan11]

The other ruck option i've been toying with is a set and forget ruck line of Cox & Sandi.. however this would mean losing Swan in favour of pendelbury..

the points you will gain from having cox and sandi is heaps more than the difference between swan and pendles

[skooper]

You could keep Swan, go Tippett to Hale...thats what Ive done...good flexibility with byes too considering Petrie and Richardson are both in my forwards from NM. Hale has kicked a few goals preseason and has good job security. Its not ideal but either Petrie/Hale will make $$ for an upgrade later on.

[tkringle]

hmm, i think i'm about to do an about face and go the Sandi-Cox set and forget.. I think pendles should perform on par with Swan till mid season..

[Usman]

Ive stuck up for meow meow enough, he is officially the new BigV

[j959]

hmm, i think i'm about to do an about face and go the Sandi-Cox set and forget.. I think pendles should perform on par with Swan till mid season..

yeah, tk - not too fussed what combo, but don't cop a doughnut for Rd1 when you don't have to ...

a 3 GC ruckline incl bench is just asking for trouble ...