BATTLE OF THE BACKS!

[nickyt]

Ok so who is the best option to bring in this week out of these guys, note i already have hodge, cornes, drummond, goddard and fisher in my backs. I only have 409 100 to spend so bowdens not in the picture. Thoughts?

[nickyt]

probably leaning against lockyer guys as his price is nearly peaking eg. very bad time to pick him up.

[Sammocorw]

Lockyer is a DT gun

[nickyt]

yer but he costs 50k more so is it worth that cost?

[MiGZ]

Mackie will do a quad again sometime this year. Enright only scores tons every 6 weeks and i wouldnt call Hargrave a premium, hes getting lucky at th mo. So get lockyer, regardless of his price, he seems like hes back in 07 form again.

[Prospector_1]

That is your decision nikita.

[nickyt]

my name is nick, dickhead.

[Prospector_1]

Interesting name, Mr Head!

[nickyt]

okok well if you've decided to treat me as a joke can u at least say something constructive about lockyer/mackie?

[Blueboys]

Go for lockyer, I have had him since the start and has done very well, worth the 50k extra too...

[Prospector_1]

OK Nick, I reckon Mackie, that was my vote, I think he ought to be a good investment. As many have said here, he's got a real chance to let loose with the return of ?Harley, so will improve in score, and earn $$$.

[nickyt]

thnx mate. another option is grant birchall.. Thoughts? Or do u think mackie is just better?

[Prospector_1]

I have Birchall, returning just in time to cover Houlihan. Very happy with that choice. I don't have Mackie (yet) but would like to add him in there. So I liked Birchall first, and don't wish to move him out. I just think that Mackie's a great buy at present.

[nickyt]

Ended up going with mackie. I jhust think his price is too good to not take. Also his b/e's like 58 so will go up 20k this week.

[Prospector_1]

Good luck, I don't think you'll be sorry.