go the gamble or have a krak?

Magpie77 · March 05, 2011, 01:01:14 PM

Andrew Karakouer has plenty of upside in his price and his ability to score, but how many games will he play, can he break into a strong collingwood side or do you just have a gamble??

so which player and why??
;D

djhar9 · March 05, 2011, 01:06:57 PM

Have a krak! To me Gamble reeks of Charlie Gardner a few years back. Couln't get a look in the Cats forward line (which isn't that special) and with all the opportunity they receive just don't deliver.

Alex7089 · March 05, 2011, 01:11:20 PM

Have a Krak.
Gamble might have a few decent games when he kicks a bag in a big win but for me his pre-season form meas nothing because when Roo/Kozi are there he won't be the target as often.

tferrier18 · March 05, 2011, 04:05:14 PM

definitely have a krak

meow meow · March 05, 2011, 05:03:55 PM

Krak/Davis/Dick are all battling for the same spot, and it's Dick's for the taking if and when he is fit. Gamble will play 22, but whether or not he scores okay is another story.

Pkbaldy · March 05, 2011, 05:06:04 PM

If you can have Krak on field. And Gamble on your bench! Gamble should be a pretty good cashcow :)

FactHunt · March 05, 2011, 05:42:25 PM

Quote from: Pkbaldy on March 05, 2011, 05:06:04 PM
If you can have Krak on field. And Gamble on your bench! Gamble should be a pretty good cashcow :)

expensive bench player...

enzedder · March 05, 2011, 05:50:09 PM

If you can afford Krakouer...he's the one of the two.

Big Ange · March 05, 2011, 05:58:28 PM

clearly the crack wins
but both would be good

gamble will play round 1 and his preseason form shows that. he will make money and he will play 22 games its up to him if his fit enough he will play saints are looking for other ways to score this season cant keep relying on roo dont say kossy his finished.

Aralt · March 05, 2011, 06:35:21 PM

Have a Krak !!

Talisman · March 05, 2011, 06:52:49 PM

Have a Krak! The better player in the (slighty) better team who will play in the better position (supercoach-wise), as he will play fwd & rotate through the middle (his clearance work can be v. good).
Gamble would be a big gamble - not from the point of view of playing (he will), rather how well he will score & how consistent he will be...? In my opinion he won't do very well on either front!

benjy251090 · March 06, 2011, 02:27:30 AM

Quote from: Talisman on March 05, 2011, 06:52:49 PM
Have a Krak! The better player in the (slighty) better team who will play in the better position (supercoach-wise), as he will play fwd & rotate through the middle (his clearance work can be v. good).
Gamble would be a big gamble - not from the point of view of playing (he will), rather how well he will score & how consistent he will be...? In my opinion he won't do very well on either front!

He could just be an expensive Gumbleton of last year in that he will play 22 games (if fit) and will be there just in case

diddley · March 06, 2011, 08:15:37 AM

krak. def krak. the one bonus gamble will have, is that he will be more unique. everyone will have krak.

MightyLions · March 06, 2011, 12:03:57 PM

why not both! both should be great cash cows! averages of 80+ for both of them I reckon!

Magpie77 · March 06, 2011, 02:45:35 PM

Quote from: meow meow on March 05, 2011, 05:03:55 PM
Krak/Davis/Dick are all battling for the same spot, and it's Dick's for the taking if and when he is fit. Gamble will play 22, but whether or not he scores okay is another story.

Actually its only krak and dick fighting for the same spot because davis is being reinvented as a running defender

go the gamble or have a krak?

Alex7089

tferrier18

meow meow