DANNNNNNYYYY STANNNNLEYYY

Started by Footy God, February 19, 2011, 11:53:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Footy God

February 19, 2011, 11:53:32 PM
Well, first game was poor scoring 15 odd points however he went nuts in the 2nd scoring 72. 12 touches, 6 marks, 4 tackles, 0.1. Mature age at 23, $106,400. Looks the goods, thoughts? Howd he go last year?

CuStArDaRm

#1
February 19, 2011, 11:57:51 PM
Totally agree looks the goods had him on the radar.
Glad they are through get to see some more of them this nab.

Footy God

#2
February 20, 2011, 12:01:09 AM
Quote from: CuStArDaRm on February 19, 2011, 11:57:51 PM
Totally agree looks the goods had him on the radar.
Glad they are through get to see some more of them this nab.
yer, should be good. However Toy and Coad are also locks for me. Toy definitely in their best 22, aboslute ball magnet while Coad ature aged also in the best 22 performed quite well. Looking forward to seieng them play again. Don't want 3 GC rookies in the backline, he will have to knock one of those 2 out.

n4cr123

#3
February 20, 2011, 12:08:37 AM
i would imagine both toy and coad would be in front of him. Hard for him to get in with Bock, Krakeour, Harbrow, brown, hunt etc...

me

#4
February 20, 2011, 12:21:38 AM
didn't watch the game cos i don't have fox but...

did he even play in defense, i got the impression from the radio call that he was playing off a forward flank/centre. just because he's listed as a defender doesn't mean he'll actually play as a defender (bit like mzungu/richardson listed as fwds when they both really only play in defense)

i'm actually considered having coad/stanley/toy as my 3 benchies, only risky for round 1 and they should all increase in value rapidly

Footy God

#5
February 20, 2011, 12:25:15 AM
Quote from: me on February 20, 2011, 12:21:38 AM
didn't watch the game cos i don't have fox but...

did he even play in defense, i got the impression from the radio call that he was playing off a forward flank/centre. just because he's listed as a defender doesn't mean he'll actually play as a defender (bit like mzungu/richardson listed as fwds when they both really only play in defense)

i'm actually considered having coad/stanley/toy as my 3 benchies, only risky for round 1 and they should all increase in value rapidly
im thinking about that as well. I have Heppel, Otten, Toy (Coad, Puopollo, Duigan) at the moment. Thinking about dropping Puopollo for Stanley.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions