KNIGHTS OR ADCOCK?

Started by Chej14, February 19, 2011, 11:14:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Chej14


Jukes

I'm trusting this is Chris Knights and Jed Adcock.

In that case, BOTH! Both will average 80+ and are under 240k!

Chej14

Quote from: Jukes on February 19, 2011, 11:22:56 PM
I'm trusting this is Chris Knights and Jed Adcock.

In that case, BOTH! Both will average 80+ and are under 240k!

yeah, chris and jed. im able to have a premium instead of one of them, so if you had to decide, who would you pick out of them?

Footy God

Quote from: Chej14 on February 19, 2011, 11:43:33 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 19, 2011, 11:22:56 PM
I'm trusting this is Chris Knights and Jed Adcock.

In that case, BOTH! Both will average 80+ and are under 240k!

yeah, chris and jed. im able to have a premium instead of one of them, so if you had to decide, who would you pick out of them?
I'm assuming you have Petrie as well?

Chej14

yeah, i have petrie as well. do you want me to post my team?

Footy God

Quote from: Chej14 on February 19, 2011, 11:56:44 PM
yeah, i have petrie as well. do you want me to post my team?
In that case go Knights imo. Im a crows supporter, will be playing a high HFF, crows retiring means he will play a more important role. Good preseason and should be gun. I've currently got Petrie and Knights with no Adcock.

CuStArDaRm

tough call. Probably knights but if its for SC Adcock did average 110 a few seasons ago. If he is healthy is capable of being up their witht he best backs.
Key of course is if he is healthy.

Chej14

it's for DT. fair enough, footy god. so with knights, i'm able to upgrade anthony and adcock to premiums. thanks for the feedback guys!