Adcock or Hurn

bjrouse · February 17, 2011, 11:53:54 PM

Interested in your opinions.

My thought is Hurn but Adcock if he finds '07 form

NegCool · February 17, 2011, 11:59:55 PM

Hard one. I think Hurn is going to be better than last year but Adcock is so cheap it is almost impossible for him to lose value. Adcock is probably a bigger risk injury wise but probably offers greater reward if he stays fit.

Mozza3 · February 18, 2011, 02:13:59 AM

Brisbane are doomed, go Hurn.

Boomz · February 18, 2011, 02:32:07 AM

Quote from: Mozza3 on February 18, 2011, 02:13:59 AM
Brisbane are doomed, go Hurn.

So are WC... but I agree. Hurn all the way.

Big_Cox14 · February 19, 2011, 09:31:15 PM

If Adcock finds form, he will be hard to pass up. Though, Hurn may be more expensive, he scores well in SC. I think Hurn is probably a safer bet of the two.

roo boys! · February 20, 2011, 09:25:21 AM

HURN HURN HURN any day of the week. Only needs 10 kicks to get a SC ton.

Damoz Merry Men · February 20, 2011, 10:29:37 AM

Hurn will be much more consistent. =]

ELLsendon · February 20, 2011, 11:20:31 AM

Hurn over adcock,