Rate me!

[Terry16]

Hey guys, please let me know what you think and any suggestions
Don't be afraid to be super critical.

Back : Goddard, Grimes, Broughton, Gibbs, Otten, McPhee, Heppell <Coad, Toy, Puopolo>

Mids : J Selwood, Montagna, Swan, Sidebottom, Danerfield, Swallow <Gaff, Harris, Mzungu>

Rucks : Sandi/Cox, Petrie <Z Smith, Bailey>

Fowards : Chapman, Roo, Buddy, Sylvia, Knights, Krakouer, Matera <Tapscott, I Smith, Callinan>

Left over : $11,400

Sandi or Cox?
Is the extra cash worth it?

[j959]

6.5/10 being very critical as you requested.

here are the (hopefully) constructive comments.

Backs: i'd go Delids over Grimes for durability reasons - no problem having Grimes as your no4 def or lower - oh wait, he is your no4. in that case maybe 'downgrade' Gibbs to Delids saving you money and then you won't have to cover for that spot in your (optimistic) prelim final (Rd23) when Carlton have a bye.

Otten = yes, McPhee = no. McPhee just not going to give you much and no upside. if you're trying to pick a mid-pricer or fallen premium he ain't it - eg Drummond is cheaper and though has inj-risk concerns, the upside potential is significant ...

Mids: Swan and Sidebum both fine on their own but will you be able to manage the Pies' byes. In my opinion Dangerfield will take up the spot of a better midfielder when you could have Danger in your fwd-line - you've already got Mzungu for MPP link for C/F

Rucks: no issues, wish I could go Cox/Petrie but i don't have the b*lls to leave Sandi out.

Fwds: no issues

on your question - Sandi over Cox - unless you've got an idea where you want to use that extra cash and can put it to better use

good luck!.

[cmgb84]

dont htink there ismuch value in sidebottom/ danger ..  play a rookie who has much more upside instead.. personally i would look at anthony & atley instead of either of them

mcphee is a no!!

go for cox to be unique

no duigan?