Main Menu

FF Champs League

Started by Mish, February 16, 2011, 10:59:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Windigo

My 3 trade plan:

Grimes>Jacob & Bruce>Rawlings/Enright
                  then
Harris>Bartel

Chopps

why jimmy over selwood

Windigo

Quotewhy jimmy over selwood

If I've worked it out correctly I cannot afford him. $ 414,000+Harris's extra cash when he passes his B/E this week.
Hoping for Bartel not to get more than his B/E of 110....

Chopps

u waiting a week to get him? i am gettin selwood but its hard to say if i would not wait the extra week for the points

who do i finish the 6 with if i get selwood?

swan, pendles, boyd, Selwood, joey & .......

Spite

The backs are very slim pickings. I don't see anyone I would want to swap grimes for. :(

Holz

selwood this week, enright the next than i bring in chappy. Happy days.

Chopps


Ziplock

Well, what can we say, Holz is one big person :P

Nah, but seriously, cat's are a pretty safe bet. Chappy, enright and selwood should easily finish in the top 6-7 of their positions barring injury.

TMurphBROWNLOW

can i join next year?  ;D

Chopps

Libba to smith & curnow to selwood 115 in the bank for swallow to mitchel or Watson next week good or bad
Trades?

Mids will be start of rd 9
Swan,pendles, Boyd, selwood, Joey, mitchel/Watson (Harris, hibberd , smith)

Chopps

Quote from: TMurphBROWNLOW on May 11, 2011, 02:31:11 PM
can i join next year?  ;D

Getting in early

Holz u got any more cats apart from the three u want

Ziplock

I really doubt there would be, are there any more cats that anyone wants? Considering the bye in the finals, 3 is stretching it with one in each line, and those three are almost definitely the cream of their crop for their respective positions.

TMurphBROWNLOW

you'd think bartel would be fine if you don't have selwood.

Ziplock

oh yeah, Bartel is fine if you already have him, but this year for a straight up comparison between the two, selwood comes up tops if you're trying to decide who to trade in.

TMurphBROWNLOW

yeahh couldn't agree with you more  ::)