sherman instead of boyd

Started by cmgb84, February 15, 2011, 11:42:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

cmgb84

noooo, i was never trying to compare the two..maybe i didnt make it clear enough!! oops

obviously don't want to start with 2 dogs midfielders, was more after info on sherman to see how he is lookin at doggie land!!

and yes, i did read the SS article, BUT had sherman on my radar for a long while!!

Holz

Quote from: cmgb84 on February 16, 2011, 10:03:36 PM
noooo, i was never trying to compare the two..maybe i didnt make it clear enough!! oops

obviously don't want to start with 2 dogs midfielders, was more after info on sherman to see how he is lookin at doggie land!!

and yes, i did read the SS article, BUT had sherman on my radar for a long while!!

i tihnk people are trying to say pick boyd dont pick sherman. Sherman could do ok but he is not going to do well enough that you can keep him. Would be beter to upgrade him to a premium keeper or a rookie

Big_Cox14

I would pick Boyd. Do not pick Sherman (I don't think he'll do well enough this year to justify being a keeper). Boyd on the other hand is one of the best.  8)