suban or adcock (5th DEF)

[dcmagadia21]

suban or adcock?

[Slap]

adcock

[david.5]

adcock for sure. averaged 85 a couple of years ago.

[Bak2Form]

adcock but will no doubt get injured......again

[valkorum]

adcock but will no doubt get injured......again

So in that case you should pick Suban :P 

[Holz]

adcock but will no doubt get injured......again

from all reports adcock looks to be finally fit, but anyway adcock is more a money maker who could possibly turn into a keeper. If he plays 10 games goes up in value 100k and goes down just upgrade to a premium.

[chatters24]

Adcock has the ability to score very very well, but as ppl have already stated he is a massive injury risk. High risk, reasonably high reward.

[dylsta05]

adcock could be buy of the year, if adcock stays injury free he will score!

[Holz]

adcock is basically just a bter version of waters. If he stays fit you will be happy to have him as your 7th backman come round 24

[j959]

hmm, fairly tough choice but Adcock has more potential IMO ...

[BU1101]

Neither. Adcock has a risk and reward debate you can read about on this site, while Suban is an average player in a team full of good youngsters. If Suban gets dropped he wont be coming back.

"If Adcock stays fit" - everywhere. IM out.

[alex booth]

adcock if he stays fit and has a good preseason

[dylsta05]

i read a article and it said his have a really good injury free pre-season

[Chopps]

neither but if i had to choose it would be adcock

[McRooster]

Adcock.

The more cock the better  ;)

Let's hope he doesn't pullett out another injury and he roosts a few big scores. Don't count your chickens before they're hatched or you'll wind up with egg on your face. Jed should be high on your pecking order though  :D