all my subs are mpp!

tails277 · February 13, 2011, 05:11:32 PM

is it worth doin??????? have picked allot of player in my starting line up with this in mind..

stewfoss · February 13, 2011, 05:55:41 PM

but are they all good picks? being mpp is useless if they wont play

hawk_88 · February 13, 2011, 05:57:08 PM

First concern is that they actually get games. MPP is useful, but first and foremost you want your rookies making money.

Boomz · February 13, 2011, 05:57:48 PM

Up fwd it's worth it but I don't think anywhere else is.

nathan11 · February 20, 2011, 01:05:35 AM

seems a bit pointless having them all mpp as you can only swap with another mpp i would keep 1 of each f/mid b/mid but the mpp list seems pretty weak except for the guys you should be starting anyway could find much better options imo

SydneyRox · February 22, 2011, 04:01:18 PM

Quote from: hawk_88 on February 13, 2011, 05:57:08 PM
First concern is that they actually get games. MPP is useful, but first and foremost you want your rookies making money.

+1

DT101 - Welcome to school boys

hoppys_hawks · February 22, 2011, 05:19:05 PM

Without naming names, it's a bit hard to comment. I think having some MPP is a good strategy, but it can't be your only strategy.
You also need to be mindful of byes, and how your structure if affected if/when you start to upgrade some of these MPPs to non-MPP players.
And +1 to the others - if they aren't going to play much, not worth the effort