Knights V Petrie

dread_lord09 · February 09, 2011, 08:21:08 PM

hi all

just having a problem deciding on who to pick over chris knights and drew petrie. I'll monitor them over the pre season, gut saids Knights for more consistentcy

elephants · February 09, 2011, 08:23:46 PM

both?

knights as a forward and petrie in your rucks?

dread_lord09 · February 09, 2011, 08:24:48 PM

going sandi and big cox 2 get the ruck option done and dusted. Petrie to me will never be a keeper/premium

elephants · February 09, 2011, 08:27:49 PM

no, he wont be a keeper BUT he will average 70-75 therfore makig about 100-150k for you. your loss but i think you should squeeze both in :)

dread_lord09 · February 09, 2011, 08:30:10 PM

if crack head doesnt perform in the pre season, i'll bring petrie back in.

foward line stands as: Chappy, voldt, green, pav, knghts, crack, prestia

elephants · February 09, 2011, 08:40:09 PM

crack head? haha

FLOPITOUT1 · February 09, 2011, 10:07:27 PM

Both

Holz · February 10, 2011, 02:37:14 AM

Quote from: elephants on February 09, 2011, 08:27:49 PM
no, he wont be a keeper BUT he will average 70-75 therfore makig about 100-150k for you. your loss but i think you should squeeze both in :)

if he can pull out a 85 average like he did in 09 and 08 than why wouldnt you keep him. I cant see many rucks averging more than that in the season. IF you start with sandilands then i dont see anyone besides possibly cox averaging more than 10 points higher

dread_lord09 · February 10, 2011, 03:08:10 AM

im still gonna stick with knights for now and hope his injury are behind him. Petrie seems more of a risk. as they say, the bigger they are, the harder they fall

Holz · February 10, 2011, 03:28:32 AM

Petrie is actually very durbale up untill last year he rarely got injured or missed a game. It might be the bigger they are the harder they fall, but the bigger they are the harder they are too push over :)

DT Junkie · February 10, 2011, 11:03:29 AM

knights in a heartbeat!

glam77 · February 10, 2011, 12:00:17 PM

got both of these sititng in my forward line.

Chopps · February 10, 2011, 05:46:44 PM

both are a must imo

CuStArDaRm · February 10, 2011, 07:04:18 PM

Knights all the way!
Dont feel you have to take both, another prem and a rook to upgrade or even keep is good.
As far as im concerned if they dont have the potential (at the moment anyway NAB may change my mind) to averag 100 Im not touching them, dont think Petrie can hold 100 all year.

Holz · February 10, 2011, 10:11:29 PM

Quote from: CuStArDaRm on February 10, 2011, 07:04:18 PM
Knights all the way!
Dont feel you have to take both, another prem and a rook to upgrade or even keep is good.
As far as im concerned if they dont have the potential (at the moment anyway NAB may change my mind) to averag 100 Im not touching them, dont think Petrie can hold 100 all year.

if your looking for knights or petrie to average 100 you must be dreaming, very very few forwards average over 100 so to expect it from these guys is a bit crazy

Knights V Petrie

FLOPITOUT1