matty kreuzer

Started by Jimbo_11, February 02, 2011, 11:05:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jimbo_11

ratten says he's on track for round 1 and they are gonna play him ruck-rover a little bit
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/carlton-coach-brett-ratten-says-matthew-kreuzer-may-play-as-ruck-rover/story-e6frf9jf-1225974509357

goood second ruck option ?

Cicjose


valkorum

That article is from before Xmas - things most likely have changed since then

Wes Mantooth

I'm not convinced he'll be 100% for round 1 and I could not understand why Carlton would see the need to risk rushing him back.

Nice to see you spelt definitely correctly Cicjose... one of my pet hates.

McRooster

Quote from: Wes Mantooth on February 03, 2011, 12:06:19 AM
I'm not convinced he'll be 100% for round 1 and I could not understand why Carlton would see the need to risk rushing him back.

Nice to see you spelt definitely correctly Cicjose... one of my pet hates.
*Grammar police  ::)

To support your cause Wes...
D-E-F-I-N-I-T-E-L-Y
The correct spelling is definitely.

Not definately.

Not definatly.

Not definantly.

Not definetly.

Not definently.

And certainly not defiantly.

The correct spelling is definitely.

At a recent spelling bee there was a young kid who asked the word to be put into a sentence, the arbitrator replied with "Matthew Kreuzer should definitely not be in your Dream Team side this year'  :P

Wes Mantooth

Quote from: McRooster on February 03, 2011, 12:16:43 AM
Quote from: Wes Mantooth on February 03, 2011, 12:06:19 AM
I'm not convinced he'll be 100% for round 1 and I could not understand why Carlton would see the need to risk rushing him back.

Nice to see you spelt definitely correctly Cicjose... one of my pet hates.
*Grammar police  ::)

To support your cause Wes...
D-E-F-I-N-I-T-E-L-Y
The correct spelling is definitely.

Not definately.

Not definatly.

Not definantly.

Not definetly.

Not definently.

And certainly not defiantly.

The correct spelling is definitely.

At a recent spelling bee there was a young kid who asked the word to be put into a sentence, the arbitrator replied with "Matthew Kreuzer should definitely not be in your Dream Team side this year'  :P

I hope you're not inferring roost that FF is a spelling bee (DEFINITELY not the case) and Jimbo_11 is the young kid (DEFINITELY cannot prove he is a young kid)? :)

McRooster

It was not my intention to suggest that. I would suggest however that Jimbo looks at Petrie or Jolly  ;)

Wes Mantooth

Quote from: McRooster on February 03, 2011, 12:38:59 AM
It was not my intention to suggest that. I would suggest however that Jimbo looks at Petrie or Jolly  ;)

and I would back your Jolly suggestion.

HevvieEvvie

#8
Quote from: McRooster on February 03, 2011, 12:38:59 AM
*Grammar police  ::)

To support your cause Wes...
D-E-F-I-N-I-T-E-L-Y
The correct spelling is definitely.

Not definately.

Not definatly.

Not definantly.

Not definetly.

Not definently.

And certainly not defiantly.

The correct spelling is definitely.

At a recent spelling bee there was a young kid who asked the word to be put into a sentence, the arbitrator replied with "Matthew Kreuzer should definitely not be in your Dream Team side this year'  :P
Quote from: Wes Mantooth on February 03, 2011, 12:20:48 AM
I hope you're not inferring roost that FF is a spelling bee (DEFINITELY not the case) and Jimbo_11 is the young kid (DEFINITELY cannot prove he is a young kid)? :)
Quote from: McRooster on February 03, 2011, 12:38:59 AM
It was not my intention to suggest that. I would suggest however that Jimbo looks at Petrie or Jolly  ;)

*Knob Jockey Police  ::)

Still putting people down, ::) might as well call you two WesMcCock.