Blukes Beta 1 Team

[Bluke]

Backs

Gibbs
Enright
Deledio
Broughton
Hargrave
Otten
Heppell

Reserves
Hunt
Falks
Wilson

Mids
Swan
Chapman
Goddard
Foley
Swallow
Gaff

Reserves
Atley
Smith, I
Wallis

Rucks
Sandilands
Cox

Reserves
Hale
Smith, Z

Forwards
Didak
Green
Goodes
Reiwoldt
Knights
Petrie
Krakouer

Reserves
Prestia
Darling
Callinan


What do you all think? Ratings?

[Bluke]

What no potato???

[Cicjose]

Goddard should be a backman swap with Heppel

Hale is too expensive as a third ruckman if you are having petrie in the forward line solely to have mpp with hale remove hale and put petrie in ruck

Darling is not due to get any early games

7 / 10

[Robert Harvey 35]

why swap goddard and heppel? they are both on the team and will contribute the same to the overall score swapping them wont do shower. you purely dont like seeing goddard in mids??? bahahahahaha pleb

[Bluke]

I dont mind spending extra cash on rucks if it means I have a solid setup (which i shouldnt have to change except to cash in on cows) which IMO i do.

Last year I skimped on the ruck and it burnt me. Wasted 2 trades getting it right. I'm not prepared to do that this year.

Obviously Darling and other young guns are easily tradable before rd 1. But I have a hunch Darling will get an early chance, even if he doesnt play rd 1 I believe he will come in and play most of the season.

Heppel and Goddard are fine the way they are. Heppel is better in the backs because there are already HEAPS of good young mid cash cows.

[Cicjose]

why swap goddard and heppel? they are both on the team and will contribute the same to the overall score swapping them wont do shower. you purely dont like seeing goddard in mids??? bahahahahaha pleb

you don't have to be rude you spastic

[Robert Harvey 35]

why suggest to swap them??? there is no benefit from doing it wat so ever!!!

[Cicjose]

the backs are the hardest place to score if you decide to put the best defender in the mids it is a waste of scoring potential.

A DT novice can work that out

[Bluke]

Backs

Lake
Gibbs
Deledio
Broughton
Adcock
Otten
Heppell

Reserves
Hunt
Falks
Duigan

Mids
Swan
Chapman
Goddard
Foley
Swallow
Gaff

Reserves
Atley
Smith, I
Wallis

Rucks
Sandilands
Cox

Reserves
Hale
Cambell

Forwards
Didak
Green
Goodes
Reiwoldt
Knights
Petrie
Krakouer

Reserves
Prestia
Darling
Callinan



A few changes based on some extra research and forethought.

[Robert Harvey 35]

if goddard is in backs scores 120 and heppell in mids scores 60. the team score is say 2100. if goddard is in mids and scores 120 and heppell in backs and scores 60 the team score is still 2100. touche...

[Bluke]

the backs are the hardest place to score if you decide to put the best defender in the mids it is a waste of scoring potential.

A DT novice can work that out

In this day an age, of rebounding defenders I disagree.

Forwards are the most inconsistant, and as such I believe they are the hardest place to score well.

[Robert Harvey 35]

solid team bluke. zach smith will score better than hale. so if you wanted to be greedy you could grab 80k and spend it on the field. but other than that there is nothing wrong with this line up. goodluck

[Bluke]

Thanks Harvs

You too

[cmgb84]

@ robert harvey 35, completely agree with cicjose... you are crazy IMO to have the best defender in the mids. i understand that until you start trading the scores will be the same, but when you do you want to have as many high scoring players as possible. if you haven't noticed,  plenty of mids have 100+ averages, where as very few defenders will. So as i can see it you, RH 35, are the pleb. touche

[Robert Harvey 35]

as long as you have a mpp in the mids and backs it makes no difference wether it is goddard or heppel or who ever in either position. and trade away you mpp links at your peril.