Forever Changing

HoF · January 24, 2011, 08:04:46 PM

Brendon Goddard (c), Brett Deledio (c), Paul Duffield, Shannon Hurn, Andy Otten, Ben Jacobs (c), Michael Coad
Josh Toy, Michael Hibberd (c), Paul Puopolo

Dane Swan, Paul Chapman (f), Leigh Montagna, Bryce Gibbs (b), David Swallow, Andrew Gaff
Dyson Heppell (b), Rohan Bewick, Tendai Mzungu (f)

Aaron Sandilands, Dean Cox
Zac Smith, Joel Tippett (f)

Nick Riewoldt, Lance Franklin, Alan Didak (c), Adam Goodes (c), Drew Petrie (f), Dion Prestia (c), Andrew Hooper
Cameron Richardson, Luke Tapscott, Ian Callinan (c)

BoredSaint · January 24, 2011, 10:54:05 PM

wow nice team..
id give it 8.5/10
only cause im bias and i dont like gibbs, chapman and hooper..
(its actually a pretty good team ;))

Luigi197 · January 24, 2011, 10:56:03 PM

fantastic team. very MPPish...

HoF · January 25, 2011, 04:43:49 AM

Thanks guys. I never used MPP last year and didn't select based on MPP this year either so initially had Chapman forward for Didak and Gibbs back instead of Duffield. Then figured I wasn't gonna get any MPP value just having Heppell to swap to back and Mzungu swapping to forward.

It seems pretty flexible but selected without MPP as the main concern. I only end up with 1 or 2 weeks with 2 players having a bye in the forwards together. All other lines is only 1 i think.

MTTY · January 26, 2011, 06:01:06 PM

Pretty good backline however starting with Otten and 2 rookies on field could be a risk.

Midfield- Really good midfield

Rucks- Cox is getting on in years, so it may be a risk.

Forwards- Starting 2 forward rookies could be a risk also

Overall 8.5/10

Luigi197 · January 26, 2011, 08:07:49 PM

Quote from: MTTY on January 26, 2011, 06:01:06 PM
Pretty good backline however starting with Otten and 2 rookies on field could be a risk.

Midfield- Really good midfield

Rucks- Cox is getting on in years, so it may be a risk.

Forwards- Starting 2 forward rookies could be a risk also

Overall 8.5/10

haha +1 ; you always seem to find flaws i cant :P

MTTY · January 26, 2011, 08:31:55 PM

Quote from: Luigi197 on January 26, 2011, 08:07:49 PM
Quote from: MTTY on January 26, 2011, 06:01:06 PM
Pretty good backline however starting with Otten and 2 rookies on field could be a risk.

Midfield- Really good midfield

Rucks- Cox is getting on in years, so it may be a risk.

Forwards- Starting 2 forward rookies could be a risk also

Overall 8.5/10

haha +1 ; you always seem to find flaws i cant :P

We all have different views that all add to a better team

Luigi197 · January 26, 2011, 08:33:56 PM

Quote from: MTTY on January 26, 2011, 08:31:55 PM
Quote from: Luigi197 on January 26, 2011, 08:07:49 PM
Quote from: MTTY on January 26, 2011, 06:01:06 PM
Pretty good backline however starting with Otten and 2 rookies on field could be a risk.

Midfield- Really good midfield

Rucks- Cox is getting on in years, so it may be a risk.

Forwards- Starting 2 forward rookies could be a risk also

Overall 8.5/10

haha +1 ; you always seem to find flaws i cant :P
We all have different views that all add to a better team

yea true that; we rule

HoF · January 27, 2011, 11:18:26 AM

I don't have a problem starting 6 rookies this season. Since there are 3 bench players to choose from and the byes fall pretty well for being able to cover positions in the forward and back line. There is definitely risk but they will be the first 2 spots upgraded so by round 6-8 would only have 1 rookie on field in backs and 1 in forwards.

I can see waht you mean about risk but i think there is as much or more risk in picking mid priced players who will play, get you and average score and not make you any money.