Adcock or Jack grimes

[Chopps]

ellis would be unique and he was a very high draft pick a few years ago i beleive...
hmmmm still not sure on adcock, he will miss games this year that is a garuntee, he has played a full season only once in his career and coming off such a serious injury why should this year be different ?
i really like scoty sewood and finding out that kelly is ONLY A MID means i could look at some cheap options like hargrave and scotty. i am also strongly considering gram?
but yes i would take adcock over grimes and spend the money elsewhere. :)

elephants are you going to take goddard & gram in the backline?

[elephants]

nope i am deciding between

hargrave, adcock.... (yuck), open to suggestions. even may take a punt on a second year player  :-X

[dylsta05]

i wouldnt get neither but if i went one ill go grimes, adcock i inj prone

[Chopps]

scott selwood?

[FLOPITOUT1]

Adcock and Grimes both injury risks.Adcock is 100k cheaper.Adcock came back for the last 4 games of last year and in his last 2 games he averaged 85.With a full preseason behind him i think he can get back to his best.I think bris have byes in the multi rounds same as melb :-\

[Shaggers]

Righto, I've made my mind up...Grimes it is!

I like the thought of him in a vastly improved Demons team this season

[Shaggers]

Oh and he''s defo gonna be a keeper

[slippery gypsy]

is scott selwood a mid only?

[Chopps]

yep thats what he is listed as at the moment

[MTTY]

Depends how much you want to spend as both are fairly injury prone

[elephants]

I have gone with adcock but if selwood is a back option lock him in :)