krakouer Team or Sub

[watson]

Should I put krakouer in my dreamteam next year or as a sub or even not at all. Also how much do ya reckon he'll cost

[Fletch74]

If you're going to have him, then you'd put him as sub only. Very risky having him on the field. Watch pre-season form. Recycled players can sometimes backfire.

[browny_wce]

yeh players like Kraks usually take a year or at least half a year to get back into it
see everyone got Luke Ball last year and most had traded him out by round 6
not wasting a trade or midfield spot again with a recycled player
(he wasnt the best DT scorer back in the day anyway)

[ossie85]

Andy K is a bit different to Luke Ball, much, much cheaper he will be than Bally.

If Andy K was playing for a bottom side - West Coast, Richmond, Brisbane, etc - then I would start him most likely (still might). But as he is playing for Collingwood which already has a thousand midfield types, he is actually no guarantee to get a consistent game.

Having said that, I'll most likely select him.

[benjy251090]

If he is named round 1, I will select him for my bench

[browny_wce]

alot different AFL player but in DT prospects, kinda similar
he's obviously been recruited for a reason
but when he played for richmond he was a small forward who occasionally went into the midfield
going to find it hard to break into that team unless theres some big injuries

[Cicjose]

he is on my bench

[Holz]

if only he went to west coast, i would put him on the field, for me its either bench or not in my team, no chance of starting

[browny_wce]

yeh wouldve been good if he went to the eagles
we needed abit of home grown magic