My fanplanner team *New edit

Started by Maca24, September 30, 2010, 12:02:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

How is it?

Awesome
1 (25%)
Great
3 (75%)
Average
0 (0%)
poor
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 0

Maca24

I just made changes to my old fanplanner.
Backs. Deledio, J.Kelly, Broughton, Hurn, Drummond, Houli, Otten.
Bench. Coad, Toy, Talia.

Mids. Goddard, Swan, Judd, D.Swallow, A.Gaff, Krakouer.
Bench. Heppell, Wallis, Norris.

Rucks. Sandilands and Petrie.
Bench. Bailey, Z.Smith.

Forwards. N.Riewoldt, Didak, Pavlich, Rioli, Brennan, Knights, Matera.
Bench. Butcher, Daw, Retzlaff.

226k in the bank. how should i spend it?
What do you all think of my team?

benjy251090

dont see any point to having daw and petrie on the same line, if you have that may as well swap daw to someone who will actually play

apart from that, solid team, nice work

Maca24

#2
thanks benjy i swapped daw with ayce cordy. hoping he mite get sum games.
should i downgrade bennell to claye beams and upgrade grimes to otten?
or just leave. keep the rates coming

benjy251090

grimes to otten seems ok, not sure about bothering with your rookies yet, i am setting my team first and then worrying about rookies after the draft/NAB Cup

tferrier18

Looks pretty good mate!

The only thing I wouldn't do if it was my team is start 5 rookies. I think 4 is the absolute most you should be starting...
Question maks over O'keefe as well, I'd try to get Goodes int here...He's ridiculously under-priced and is a must have.

Otherwise it's a pretty damn good team...

dylsta05

good start buddy,

i like it some risk tho but thats what i like, lots of MPP which is great

Barlow 21


Maca24

Quote from: Barlow 21 on October 01, 2010, 06:53:36 PM
I would start 5 rookies ;D
thanks for the comments guys. so would I barlow lol i hate mid pricers.
tferrier i will change ROK to goodes?

Bosh

Obviously done your research, well done.  :P

Maca24

just changed ROK to goodes keep the rates coming. want to fit otten in but cant see it happening.

Maca24

people? please lol  i rated yours  ;D
was also thinking chappy to brown and grimes to otten. just an idea though so what do you all think?

tferrier18

Quote from: Maca24 on October 05, 2010, 06:05:17 PM
people? please lol  i rated yours  ;D
was also thinking chappy to brown and grimes to otten. just an idea though so what do you all think?

I'd feel much safer if you swapped chapps to brown and grimes to otten!! Would find it very hard to fault this team if you made that move. 8-9/10 if you make that move...
If it was my team I wouldn't start 2 fwd rookies, for me the only place to start more than 1 rookie is in the mids.

hope this helps

CrowsFan

Agree about starting 2 rookies in the forward line. Seems a bit risky to me.
Apart from that looks to be a very strong team

Maca24

thanks heaps fellas will make a few edits soon. appreciate it.

LiveTheDream

very very solid team maca!

+ : backs will beat most others imo, goddard in the mids and starting two rookies is a good call as they are often as good as the mid-pricers, good rucks, solid group of forwards, well used MPP, and way to steer clear of those tempting mid-pricers (they will burn you)

- : instead of starting 2 fwd rookies you should have 1 fwd and 1 def start as backs are often more reliable than fwds. save some $$ and start one of the rookie priced GC backs (coad and iles are mature bodies and should be better than a fwd rookie). honestly not much else mate good job