Main Menu

Who's Better? Judd or Goodes?

Started by Master Q, September 21, 2010, 04:06:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Fireballz

Goodes annoys me because he has the ability to single-handedly pick his team up and carry them over the line but he just doesn't do it. He wins a few games off his own boot but his best finals games he isn't best on ground. Maybe 2003 semi against Port...

Barlow 21

Q I have to admit the triple brownlow medalist Goodes is the better player. :D

cookie311993

they are very close but hard to judge when they are in different environments. Lately Judd has been playing with better team around him then Goodes, yet Goodes keep racking up disposals. Tough choice but favouring Goodes

BoredSaint

Judd but only due to his missus :-*

bomberboy0618

Quote from: BoredSaint on January 15, 2011, 04:01:44 PM
Judd but only due to his missus :-*
+1
Goodes and Judd, hmm, hard one, goodes based on number of years doing it.

pyronerd

i have come to the conclusion (thanks to the congrats juddy thread) that mrs judd is better then them both  ;)

bomberboy0618

Quote from: pyronerd on January 15, 2011, 10:38:09 PM
i have come to the conclusion (thanks to the congrats juddy thread) that mrs judd is better then them both  ;)
haha nice pyro, she just makes all the players stare at her when shes on the field, or more  ;D

BoredSaint

Quote from: bomberboy0618 on January 15, 2011, 10:39:31 PM
Quote from: pyronerd on January 15, 2011, 10:38:09 PM
i have come to the conclusion (thanks to the congrats juddy thread) that mrs judd is better then them both  ;)
haha nice pyro, she just makes all the players stare at her when shes on the field, or more  ;D
all she has to do is get the ball at full back, then wear 'that' dress and run straight through all the drooling players :P

Junktimer

Judd by a mile.  Judd doesn't have games where he does showerhouse.

Cruiseon


We'll probably need to judge in 3-4 years time, Judd is awesome (yes Carlton still are a one man team) but Goodes is so underrated. Watching him in the flesh provides such a better insight than on TV.


RiOtChEsS


ossie85

Quote from: Marcz on January 19, 2011, 11:23:51 AM
apples and oranges...

Going off topic on a mini rant not directed at anyone in particular. But you know what, I've never really understood that phrase.

Apples and oranges... They're both fruit, tasty, juicy, round, similar size and can be interchanged with each other.

Why not "its like comparing apples and thermo-nuclear weapons"

/off topic rant.

Cruiseon


I agree Ossie, I think Apple Juice and Orange Juice in particular are quite comparable.

Junktimer

Quote from: Cruiseon on January 19, 2011, 10:01:52 AM

We'll probably need to judge in 3-4 years time, Judd is awesome (yes Carlton still are a one man team) but Goodes is so underrated. Watching him in the flesh provides such a better insight than on TV.

on the other hand Cruise, he won 2 brownlows, which doesn't make him underrated surely.  For the record, I believe he was fortunate to win the two.

nas

Quote from: ossie85 on January 19, 2011, 11:32:30 AM
Quote from: Marcz on January 19, 2011, 11:23:51 AM
apples and oranges...

Going off topic on a mini rant not directed at anyone in particular. But you know what, I've never really understood that phrase.

Apples and oranges... They're both fruit, tasty, juicy, round, similar size and can be interchanged with each other.

Why not "its like comparing apples and thermo-nuclear weapons"

/off topic rant.

A comparison of apples and oranges occurs when two items or groups of items are compared that cannot be validly compared.  Judd is the better choice as consistent where as Goodes can be hot n cold