2011 Player Profile: Paul Duffield

Started by Aidans Blues, September 15, 2010, 09:07:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Will you pick him?

Certainty
3 (18.8%)
On the short list
6 (37.5%)
50/50
4 (25%)
Unlikely
1 (6.3%)
No way
2 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 6

Aidans Blues

Paul Duffield
2010 Stats:
Games:22
Total Score: 1996(ranked 76 in comp) 
Centuries: 7 of 22
Standard Deviation: 23.6
Average: 90.7
High: 142 (Round 3)
Low: 51 (Round 22)
Starting Price: 517,500
High Price: 525,900
Low Price: 423,700

Summary: Paul Duffield continued on from his good season in 2009 with another solid year. Was quite consistent and reliable all year, but dropped his average by 7 ppg from 2009.

The Crystal Ball:
Price: 481,700
Position: DEF
Not a bad price, and would definently be a solid pick if chosen.

Verdict: It may come down to personal choice and the issues with the byes, as it would be hard to have Broughton and Duffield in the same defence. Definitely one to watch and is on my shortlist.
Will you pick Duffield in 2011?

Alex7089

I don't think so, I will would rather have Broughton in SC.

I agree you couldn't have both so that is my answer.

Boomz

I doubt it i'll be getting broughton...

benjy251090

wont rule him out, depends on how much i have to spend, same as the buddy/rioli predicament up front

sunny_side_down

Has stood up in the finals showing what I thought was a soft mentality, far off the mark. Saying that, if tagged he doesn't really deal too well with that aspect and with freo becoming a good team, attention to Duffman will increase. No for me

ossie85


Almost locked in. I just like saying DUFFMAN!

Fletch74

Very consistent. If he has a good preseason he will be on my short list

DazBurg

Quote from: Alex7089 on September 15, 2010, 09:13:40 PM
I don't think so, I will would rather have Broughton in SC.

I agree you couldn't have both so that is my answer.
+1 agree with you Ax

Hawka

DUFFMAN is beta at dt i reckon and Broughton at SC so no for me in sc

Maca24

Duffy scores to many 50s for me and not enough tonnes