Scott Pendlebury: 2011

Started by DazBurg, September 12, 2010, 08:56:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Will you pick Penddlebury

Lock him in
on the short list
Upgrade target later in season
Unlikely
NO

DazBurg

Scott Pendlebury

2010 Stats
Games: 22
Total Score: 2,432 (Ranked 9th overall, 9th amongst midfielders)
Average Score: 110.55 (Ranked 14th overall, 13th amongst midfielders)
High: 145 (Round 11)
Low: 73 (Round 3)
Centuries: 15 out of 22
Starting Price: $595,200
High Price: $578,600 (round 16) (never got back up to his starting price)
Lowest Price: $504,300 (round 9)

Summary:


Scott Pendlebury found consistency in his game this year which would of made the fantasy coaches  who had him quite happy with 15 scores of 100+ out of 22 games a pretty good return. Plus only 3 scores were below 90 for the year.

The Crystal Ball:
Based on last year's magic number


Price: $587,131
Position: MID

Next year

Decision:

Turning 23 next year and still improving. With teams trying to negate the influence of Dane Swan will that make pendlebury stamp himself even more?. Or will he get more attention an how will that affect him?.
Personally he looks good couple him with selwood in your mids and you got two of the best young guns who are still improving. Only one problem with Pendlebury is his price tag since in 2010 he never even got to the value his starting at for 2011. Might be a goo upgrade target. Either way the big question is

Will Scott Pendlebury be selected by you in 2011?

Aidans Blues

I've had him the last 2 years, but will having Swan and Pendles in the same midfield be bad with the byes?

DazBurg

Quote from: Aidans Blues on September 12, 2010, 09:05:51 AM
I've had him the last 2 years, but will having Swan and Pendles in the same midfield be bad with the byes?
yeah that might be a problem....i forgot about that

ossie85


I love Pendals. Nuff said. Definitely a look in.

But yes, the byes does add that extra issue

benjy251090

as Daz said in the description, he never got to his full price in 2010, so will be an upgrade target AFTER collingwoods second bye, unless they have a bye during finals time

DazBurg

Quote from: benjy251090 on September 12, 2010, 10:36:59 AM
as Daz said in the description, he never got to his full price in 2010, so will be an upgrade target AFTER collingwoods second bye, unless they have a bye during finals time
hey i can see you reading it thoroughly...good boy...lol... ;D

Alex7089

Sounds like the way to go benjy ;)

benjy251090


SCADDICT

Pendles is definiitely an option. Like Marc Murphy, he is one of those reasonably priced players who you can depend on for good scores every week.

Justin Bieber

Wouldn't a Selwood and Pendles double sound good next year :P. Both are improving by the year. Expensive but worth it considering they play for top teams and score consistently.

Shortlisted for me for the time being.

thatguy

Quote from: Hellopplz on September 12, 2010, 10:19:14 PM
Wouldn't a Selwood and Pendles double sound good next year :P. Both are improving by the year. Expensive but worth it considering they play for top teams and score consistently.

Shortlisted for me for the time being.
had them this year, alongside garry.
was a very happy man.

Wilkopolis

Never got to his starting price, but like Selwood probably still has some improvement left in him.

The price is right for me, but hard to justify him in my team over Swan