Main Menu

Trade for Taz

Started by valkorum, September 11, 2010, 12:27:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ossie85


The Pies want him because he will be cheap. Since he played for the Pies for 9 years, after 1 year we can put him on the veterans.

Collingwood can pay him more than others cos of this

hawk_88

Apparently Pelchen said that the Hawks have no interest in Thornton. Think that is for the best.

Hawka

valky has grover signed cos i heard a rumour bout a fortnight ago hawks may go for him and i only want a key defender if he is better than the ones we already have so yes i want tarrant but no to thorton

Hawka

Wat our list manager said--- Chris Pelchen says Hawthorn is a "long shot" to get Tarrant, with Collingwood clearly in the box seat. No interest in Thornton. Has asked after Hale.

valkorum

All reports are that Grover hasn't re-signed yet.  All rumours over here lead to either a 1 year deal or retirement (depends if he thinks his body can handle another season).

I doubt he would take up a deal interstate seeing as he only has 1 or 2 left in him. 

roo boys!


Hawka


roo boys!


MarkPlow

Hale is useless we don't need him I don't want him at Hawthorn. We need a decent ruckman not a washed up one

Hawka

by the sounds of the hawks we have a new game plan which will see stars playin in diffrent postions apparnetly hale fits it nicely and he is a good back up fwd if buddy or roughy are injured

valkorum

There is talk of Roughy going down back

hawk_88

Quote from: valkorum on October 07, 2010, 08:06:08 PM
There is talk of Roughy going down back

Doubt it. Has played there for a number of matches at the start of his career. Didn't fit.

Talk I have been hearing is playing Buddy much more up the ground. Apparently he will be focusing on building endurance over the pre-season.

Whatever happens.... why can't Skipper play this ruck/forward role that everyone is suggesting Hale will play? Rate him more highly than Hale.

valkorum

It does seem strange going for Hale with the number of big men you have on your list already.

hawk_88

It seems bizarre to me. We have the second most listed ruckman in the AFL. A number are still in development but still 4 who have senior experience.

My guess is the Hawks aren't confident that Bailey will make it. Otherwise I can't see a need to go for Hale.

valkorum

I thought you guys had equal first ruckmen on your list