Mumford in 2011?

Started by tferrier18, September 06, 2010, 03:14:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tferrier18

Mumford was clearly the second best ruckman in 2010 but his big scores came after Seaby went down in round 6 (or something)...

My question is, with Seaby returning in 2011, do you all think Mumford will be able to keep up his average of 92? He won't have as much time in the ruck but he has so much promise, which is why I want to put him in my side!

Cheers

ossie85

#1
Well, first of all, Mumford wasn't clearly the 2nd best ruckmen (Mummy, Jamar and Jolly were all pretty close IMO)

And yes, the Seaby question is an interesting one for sure! I think Seaby is overrated, and may struggle to get games if Mummy is in the team


2010 Stats
Games: 19
Total Score: 1759 (Ranked 81st overall, 5th amongst ruckmen)
Average Score: 92.58 (Ranked 67th overall, 2nd amongst ruckmen)
High: 175 (Round 20)
Low: 46 (Round 21)
Standard Deviation: 31.17
Centuries: 6 out of 19
Starting Price: $282,700
High Price: $503,000 (round 21)
Lowest Price: $282,700 (round 1)


The Crystal Ball:

Based on last year's magic number

Price: $491,700
Position: RUC


Justin Bieber

Quote from: ossie85 on September 06, 2010, 03:24:17 PM
Based on last year's magic number

Price: $491,700
Position: RUC
That price tag will scare me off :o.

Seaby coming back in will mean he will have to split his time. Could hurt his current scoring :(. Might be number 1 ruck ahead of Seaby next year after his second half of the year accompanied with him being a bit more agile than Seaby. Doubt he'll be in my team though.

C-Dogg

hellopplz is right... seaby coming back will def scare people off... we need lonesome ruckmen like JOLLY ( oNLY IF WOOD ISNT GETTING A GAME) maybe HILLE ( seeing ryder might play forw/back) and FRASER ( if or when he heads to sunny goldy)

Alex7089

No to Mummy for me. Hoping for A Cox/Ryder + Sandi combo with Petrie in the forward line, that is pretty set for me 8)

ossie85


Finals performance:

v Blues @ Home: 73

tferrier18

Quote from: ossie85 on September 07, 2010, 01:37:09 PM

Finals performance:

v Blues @ Home: 73

They weren't at their actual home ground. ANZ stadium is a much wider ground to the SCG and doesn't provide Sydney with anywhere near as much of an advantage that the SCG does.

Mumford did play well, but Jacobs played the best game of his season. I think it'd be very unfair to judge him as a SC player on that one final.

His price will play a big part in his selection, and I'll end up having Sandilands and Cox/Mumford. Cox may be in front at this stage though.

CFC 1979

don't think so

looking at SANDI, PETRIE + ZAC SMITCH bench ruck

Petrie + smith will be at bargain base prices leaving fat for elsewhere

tferrier18

Quote from: CFC 1979 on September 07, 2010, 06:42:46 PM
don't think so

looking at SANDI, PETRIE + ZAC SMITCH bench ruck

Petrie + smith will be at bargain base prices leaving fat for elsewhere

Will definitely be looking at having petrie somewhere in my team. I had him in my 2009 team (Pretty sure I had him in ruck pos)

Who's Zac Smitch? GC?


Torress

mind u ossie its only an arthroscope to clean up a little bit of cartlige. nothing to worry about there.
yea def a no 490k!!!   :o  no chance won't even consider at that price. ryder, cox, sandi, petrie. out of those 4 just depends on where i end up putting petrie, i like ryder petrie and smith, bailey on bench. 576k for a ruck for sandi is prob a bit more than i wanna spend there. so uprgrade a bailey or smith to sandi- swap petrie with daw, then u got cover. ah it sounds so simple now 

Justin Bieber

The same rucks I'm looking at Torress. And I was planning to upgrade to Sandi eventually when he falls in price.

MajorLazer

Not having him and Sandi in the rucks together. Too much money spent there. Don't think he will have the same fantasy output as last season anyway.

Maca24

wont be starting him. should get a look later in the year though.

Junktimer

interrupted pre season means i will not start with him.  however i may upgrade to him mid season