Ruck dilemma

[CODY13]

I have a massive ruck dilemma can anyone help me?
i want cox but have to put a rookie ruckmen on the field as a result...
im currently thinking cox and currie from the swans
ideas...

[Pravis]

i would either, not take cox and get 2 lower cost rucks like Ottens and Simmons.
OR
White from Sydney would be the back up ruckman for jolly. But white is a little more expensive then most rookies.

[Aminal]

If u want cox my advice is to wait till he has a few "off" weeks and his price drops considerably. Being so costly, 1 or 2 shower weeks will cause a massive drop in his price. I personally will only get him around the low 400's.

[chunky]

Does anyone think that Kruezer is worth a punt this year ? Anyone got any mail on his pre-season ? And/or the likely role that he will play in 2009 ?

[Aminal]

I think kreuzer will average between 50-70, but he is not bad value at his price. Id say he is likely to play a 75/25 mix of ruck/forward this year. His old man rekons he'll start the season off in the ruck, with robbie warnock still recooperating from injury. He'll be in my team though. A little biast i guess.

[jasontheanonymous]

id go with currie...

[dubs$men]

a rookie ruck is a big risk... you end up cursing yourself every week when he gets 30s only which may well happen...

[Uncle]

I agree with many of the different sentiments that people have put in here... wait til cox drops etc. one more option (not what i'll be doing but i have money in the bank) and that is if u can afford that tiny bit more, get warnock and currie. if currie is fit for r1 he will start, no doubt. he can cover til warnock comes back, and will be very effective this year