cox vs hille

[thefly1976]

everyone thinks cox. I think hille.
will the 4 boundry ump's continue?

[F-Bomber]

Cox is the better player no doubt, but Hille was a massive improver last year with similarly dominant performances around the ground. Given the absolute gulf in value, i reckon Hille's better value

... of course, if you have the money Cox can add 10-20 points per game than Hille (based on last year) and if he goes down ie. through injury, its always easier to downgrade to Hille or maybe Simmonds

[Untouchables]

Cox is by far the better player. Hille is a rck wannabe and only gets a game cos Laycock is his opposition.Laycock makes any dud look brilliant.Cox is far more athletic, creative,skillful and smart.I think Hille is in for a really crap year.

[Cutty]

premium players like cox usually drop in value for a brief time early on in the season so I'm gambling on Hille at first and hope cox drops in value early

[gerry01]

you've gotta go cox to begin the season. if he has a bad week you're looking at a 85-95. thats still 10 - 15 points better than any other ruck. if he has a good week you're looking at a 110 - 120. definately gotta go cox

[dubs$men]

im taking both... i think getting two good rucks from the start is important and worth the money.. no rookies come through like the other positions and besides Simmons a few years ago there is very rarely a bargain to be found among the rucks