whats Bsti got to do to get Rising star nomination

Started by CFC 1979, August 10, 2010, 06:25:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

CFC 1979

this poor bloke is stiff

played every round and for mine should have recieved nomination for rising star

roo boys!

Defs deserves to be nominated by now, soon he will be i think.

CFC 1979


Master Q


roo boys!

Quote from: CFC 1979 on August 10, 2010, 06:59:36 PM
it would be a disgrace if he didn't RB
Agreed. (thats how you do it Q ;D)

Yeah I love him too. But not as much as Boomer! :-* :-*

CFC 1979

yep basti stepped up after Barlow went down

finally Nth has done something good for me RB

roo boys!


ossie85

Quote from: CFC 1979 on August 10, 2010, 06:25:52 PM
this poor bloke is stiff

played every round and for mine should have recieved nomination for rising star


Good to see you guys are just full of football knowledge!

Bastinac didn't receive a nomination this week cos he got one in round 3

rooattack

Basti was nominated for a the rising star award after round 3.

if he was from a more hyped club he would be more of a chance of winning the award,probably will end up in 2nd or 3rd position.

Very good 1st year from the young bloke

ossie85

Quote from: rooattack on August 10, 2010, 08:47:36 PM
Basti was nominated for a the rising star award after round 3.

if he was from a more hyped club he would be more of a chance of winning the award,probably will end up in 2nd or 3rd position.

Very good 1st year from the young bloke

I'm sick of that excuse - given Danyle Pearce and Rhys Palmer have won it recently from non-Victorian, non-hyped clubs.

Bastinac was dropped a few weeks ago and luckily got a late call-up. He has been a GREAT find but I think Hanneberry, Scully, Trengove, Reid, Stratton and Hurley are ahead of him this year.

rooattack

Beat me to the punch,ossie,i think CFC1999 get all his FACTS from Caro,while they eat grapes naked,fondiling each other.


rooattack

Ossie,Scully has more potential,but in no way ,shape or form has had a better year than Basti.Scully=hype.
Hanneberry has had a few great matches,i saw one live myself,no where near as consistant as Basti tho.Sydney/AFL=hype
Ben Reid,you must be kidding me.This is his 4th year,the kid has been hopeless for 3.Collingwood=over-hyped
Stratton has been very good,and flown under the radar.
Hurley has been OK the last few weeks,but up until then has been more up and down than CFC1999 on Caro last night.Like Reid,he should not even be allowed in to the award for this year.
So in finishing ossie,it;s no excuse,it's a fact

ossie85


The fact that Reid and Hurley are not first years players doesn't change the fact they are nominated, they are.

Ben Reid has proven to be part of Collingwood's back 6 = currently ranked first on the ladder. I believe Bastinac would not make the Collingwood side atm.

Scully and Trengove are hyped for a reason. Because they are playing KEY roles in their first years. Key!

Comparisons on a purely stats basis (I'm aware this is not perfect):

Scully v Bastinac
Games: 18 v 19
Average Kicks: 9.2 v 9.0
Average Handballs: 11.8 v 9.5
Average Disposals: 21 v 18.5
Average Marks: 3.7 v 2.2
Score: 4.3.37 v 7.9.51
Average Tackles: 3.7 v 2.7
Average SC: 69.7 v 69.6

Apart from goals, admittedly significant, Scully wins every other stats.

It is close though, I just feel Scully has been better.

Hannebery is my pick for the Rising Star.

rooattack

Collingwood's backline will be where they fail this September.

The pressure the midfield has been able to generate has been sensational,but once teams start to separate your defenders it will be clear for all to see.

SCADDICT

Bastinac has easily been better then Ben Reid ossie. Reid is consistent but nothing to ride home about.