Heath Hocking/ what to do?

[nickyt]

ok fella massive dilema. Will heath hocking play in the first 8 rouns so that i have time to upgrade him?

ok say i have decided i need to get rid of hentshel obviously, but i will also get rid of dalziel to free up some cash.

3 options,

Gibbs and Krakour

Hocking and Braddy Johnson ( prefferred option so long as hocking gets a game)

or Zaharakis and Richardson (very risky as will be plying either beams or zaharakis with rich on the feild)

Need to know about hocking because on last  2 games think he could be gun?

and believe krakour is a risk.

[TigerFever]

Personally i like Gibbs and Krack better as they look like the most consistent combo there.

[SpeedMeades]

Hocking will stay in the side unless he gets an injury. Watched him last year and he has got good skills and goes hard for the ball.

He will be a very reliable player in the midfield for the Bombers in years to come. If it weren't for his awkward price, I would have picked him up in a flash.

Don't expect him to do so well every game. It was Fremantle after all.

[CODYJ]

Gibbs and Krakouer is the way better option.

[nickyt]

guys i think i am leaning towards the hocking johnson as hocking will make me a tonne and i will be able to upgrade at rd 6?

any other thoughts/opinions would be great guys.

[nickyt]

i forgot to mention that i think krakour is a bit iffy? does anyone else agree with this? i feel that one bad game will give him a one way ticket out of the team the way things are going for port currently. I understand that gibbs will score better than Brad Johnson but i feel that i need to get that premium into my forward line and by having hocking will very soon be able to get another premium in my midfield anyway. What are your thoughts guys? is anyone in a similar position?