seems ridiculous but is it?

Started by thornz23, June 27, 2010, 10:21:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

What do u think?

dnt trade
Waters-kelly/duffield and Stants to Boyd
Waters to Gilbee/grimes and stants to chappy
Waters to grimes/gilbee and stevey j to chappy
Waters to H shaw and Pods to chappy

thornz23

to start with i have 6 trades left and my team is set. Atm i have a back bench player playing and 2 fwd bench players playing to cover my fwds and mids. The team is completely set and im getting no zero's atm..
So, im thinking this week about going waters to gilbee/ grimes, meaning i can upgrade stant to chappy,
Or i could do stants to boyd and waters to broughton, duffield or kelly..
im just sick of stanton getting shut down under a tag. And obviously waters is overpriced for his average (even though he is dominating atm)..
So is it worth it? or too sideways?

elxam

if you didn't have chappy in the first place having him now is a little too risky - we all know about his hammies.

waters can get injured any time soon too with the way he plays - imo, and I have him, too - and he's defnitely overpriced, or is he ?

kelly is also a big risk, injury wise, so is grimes. Gilbee's not as consistent as gilbert.


IMO. Too sideways and with 6 trades left, definitely not worth it. Try and ride stanton out.

thornz23

yeh ure right about chappy. it is annoying that i missed out on so many good weeks from him but it probly is too risky now.. But like u said aswell waters just has no regard for himself throwing himself at the footy which makes me worried about a major injury. And at 420k he is about 12 points under what he should be averaging for that price. Im reeeally tempted by waters to broughton and stanton to boyd. I just think both the ins would be a bit more reliable than the outs. I think aswell that i have to get stanton out come finals time. and im ranked 769 atm so would like to push for top 500.
But im not sure when broughton is due back and it really would be helpful to keep 6 trades still for injuries.. I just dnt know on this 1 :P

elxam

#3
am almost with you if you can get gilbert (if you don't have him yet) and boyd ...

but gee, that's two good trades you seem to be throwing around - could either be top 500 or 5000 in a few weeks. imo

thornz23

yeh i have gilbert sorry my backs r hodge god carrazzo waters eski gilbert and enright
and my mids are GAJ swan bartel joey barlow n stants. It is very tempting but i think the smart thing to do is just wait till its closer to finals and re-assess then

Prospector_1

Quote from: elxam on June 27, 2010, 10:27:31 PM
Gilbee's not as consistent as gilbert.

But he is mpp - consider bringing him into your midfield. If you think it looks better, shift God or Hodge to your mids then ...

elephants


thornz23

i would still like to really have god and hodge in the backline and get another reli high scoring mid if i am gna pull this trade though.

OCT23JNR

Quote from: thornz23 on June 27, 2010, 10:21:15 PM
to start with i have 6 trades left and my team is set. Atm i have a back bench player playing and 2 fwd bench players playing to cover my fwds and mids. The team is completely set and im getting no zero's atm..
So, im thinking this week about going waters to gilbee/ grimes, meaning i can upgrade stant to chappy,
Or i could do stants to boyd and waters to Broughton, duffield or kelly..
im just sick of stanton getting shut down under a tag. And obviously waters is overpriced for his average (even though he is dominating atm)..
So is it worth it? or too sideways?

Before you even consider bringing in Broughton you should see this information regarding his comeback game. He suffered a hamstring injury.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/broughton-suffers-injury-setback/story-e6frf9jf-1225885225769

Chappy35

do it! get chappy when he is back. you have the trades and if your team is set. allthough if you are still rocking pods maybe do him to chappy. i have a feeling the pods will cop a couple weeks rest before the endo of the season

RiOtChEsS

Quote from: OCT23JNR on June 28, 2010, 03:12:09 PM
Quote from: thornz23 on June 27, 2010, 10:21:15 PM
to start with i have 6 trades left and my team is set. Atm i have a back bench player playing and 2 fwd bench players playing to cover my fwds and mids. The team is completely set and im getting no zero's atm..
So, im thinking this week about going waters to gilbee/ grimes, meaning i can upgrade stant to chappy,
Or i could do stants to boyd and waters to Broughton, duffield or kelly..
im just sick of stanton getting shut down under a tag. And obviously waters is overpriced for his average (even though he is dominating atm)..
So is it worth it? or too sideways?

Before you even consider bringing in Broughton you should see this information regarding his comeback game. He suffered a hamstring injury.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/broughton-suffers-injury-setback/story-e6frf9jf-1225885225769
goodwork mate ;)

Master Q


thornz23

#12
yeh thanks i just saw that 2day about broughton. bit annoying :P. Im thinking now about doing stevey j to Chappy because ROK is iffy aswell this week apparently.. i cant have 3 zeros in the fwds with brown alrdy and now stevey gone for at least 3. so i could do waters to gilbee/grimes and stevey to chappy..
Another option is waters to h shaw.. and pods to chappy.. only if ROK is named though

thornz23

Im hearing now that chappy is out again this week aswell lol.. So thinking now about just going stevey j to buddy.. C if waters can keep pulling big scores.. BUt i really dnt like stevey j and dnt no y i have him in my team so now would seem like the right time to get rid of him.. :P

Justin Bieber

Quote from: thornz23 on June 28, 2010, 07:14:28 PM
Im hearing now that chappy is out again this week aswell lol.. So thinking now about just going stevey j to buddy.. C if waters can keep pulling big scores.. BUt i really dnt like stevey j and dnt no y i have him in my team so now would seem like the right time to get rid of him.. :P
The decision is made then!!! Never choose players you don't like :).