What Hypothetical Option Is Better?

Started by Windigo, June 26, 2010, 04:52:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Windigo

I'm going to throw this idea out to you.

Option 1

Nason>Strijk

Then Ladson>Hodge or Lake

OR

Option 2

Nason>Strijk

Then Fyfe>Didak Or Harvey+$$ Or Douglas

Please Note that Strijk would just be a bench player with J.Hunt if i do option 1.

Option 2 would see J.Hunt being a seventh Back.

Then i would have 5 trades for finals. My team is complete if i do any of these trades.

I have good bench cover on all positions.

elxam


Master Q

Option 1. Hodge and Lake just too good to turn away.

Windigo

Okay.

Hodge
Or Lake (something different?)


roo boys!


Master Q


Windigo

But everyone has Hodge, so it kind of nullifies your score against everyone.

He will help my overall score most definitely.

But Lake is something different.




roo boys!

Hodge will outscore Lake, so go Hodge.

Master Q

Windigo you asked who you should go? I said Hodge, you think you should go Lake, then go Lake? It's your team.

roo boys!


Master Q


roo boys!


Windigo



True. I had Hodge last year and he burned me bad.

That's why i didn't pick him this year, thinking that he'd do the same.
That was a bad move.  ::)

Went Duff Man instead.

But I'm still beating everyone in my league, and everyone
has Hodge but me.

Justin Bieber

I don't have Hodge :-[. But seems the best option down back (except Goddard).

P.S Are you feeling bored? Go vote and/or nominate yourself for the Fanfooty Personality Of The Year down in the front bar :D. Anyone can enter if they want to :). Scroll down the main page of the forum down to front bar. Then search for the thread labelled as the above. Hope a few more voters appear ;D.

Blueboys

Quote from: Windigo on June 26, 2010, 05:27:54 PM

Went Duff Man instead.


Classic after every 1 said get Hodge you went Duffman! hahaha  ;D