Scotland+Gysberts or Judd+Broadbent?

Started by Tobias, June 04, 2010, 02:34:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Scotland+Gysberts or Judd+Broadbent?

Scotland + Gysberts
5 (55.6%)
Judd + Broadbent
2 (22.2%)
Something else (list below)
2 (22.2%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Tobias

I'm trading out Lindsay Gilbee (MID) and Pearce Hanley (DEF). Why do I have Pearce Hanley? No idea.

I have $192,000 banked.

Anyway, should I replace them with Heath Scotland and Jordan Gysberts? Or Chris Judd and Matthew Broadbent?

Tobias


thornz23


Tobias


thornz23

whats ure team? u must have more important trades to make than gilbee

Tobias

#5
BACKS: Goddard, Hodge, Enright, Goodwin, Heath, Sheppard, Webberley (Hanley, Menzel)
MID: Ablett, Swan, Barlow, Kelly, Gilbee, Bastinac (Armstrong, McKeever)
RUC: Sandilands, Blake (Fitzpatrick, Vardy)
FWD: Pods, Johnson, O'Keefe, Didak, Brown, Mooney, Grant (Watts, Webb)

Want to be able to use Heath as a backup. Gilbee allows me to get some value in trade. Thought about trading O'Keefe or Goodwin in addition to Hanley who never gets a game.

Holz

you  3 non keepers in the backline and you trade out gilbee, horror trade , down grade someone and upgrade basti or blake

Cicjose

Get rid of blake surely you can get a better ruckman than Mark Blake into your side

Holz

hanley to heath/broadbent than blake to cox

thornz23

definately dnt trade gilbee. U need to get rid of 3 of ure last 5 backs and bastinac and blake before u start sideways trading premiums..

Tobias

Already have Heath, and Cox+Broadbent is more than Hanley+Blake+$192,000.

Maybe I should just wait another week.

I could upgrade Blake-->Cox, and Hanley --> someone $156,400 or less. That might be Taylor Hunt, Tyson Slattery or Prestigiacomo. But none of those are quite what I'm looking for.

Tobias

OK, so I'm hearing "Don't trade Gilbee--too sideways of a trade". Trade Blake.

Since I don't have enough to trade Blake --> Cox and Hanley for a decent player, I think I'll wait one more week before trying to upgrade. Cox's BE is 120.