drummond v adcock

[bluebaggas]

with drummond, you have a half back who will most likely rack up the possies and could score very well if effective

adcock will play in the middle as well as maybe a bit of half back flank, he will get hard ball gets and could have (another) breakout year

both have proven they can be big scorers as shown in 2007 when they both averaged over 110

adcocks price is lower than it should be due to 2 games where he scored 4 and 6 because of injury last year

not sure whether to get drummond, or adcock and pocket the extra 80k

any thoughts?

[bluebaggas]

geez i finally put some effort into a post and no one reply's

[Bo]

kk ill reply for ya. Drummond is insane. If adcock starts rattling off 100s tho you can jump on him too, but i'd start with drummond.

[cooney17]

If you are going to have Drummond make sure you have a strong bench player.   

Id be staying away from Adcock. I think Dalzeill his taken his midfield role so more of a Back role.

And I know how it feels to get no replys

[Griff]

its better to do polls when u want replies.. i like drummond